Daly is here about talk about americas cup. Let me say that im not inclined to go out of my way to do something for fear that somehow the Event Authority is going to go after the city because it failed to meet its obligations. Given, to be frank, the number of promises that were made about americas cup and how many of those promises were never really delivered, i would welcome any challenge that the city somehow failed to meet its obligations. So, i would say im prepared to act. I am convinced something is necessary, im convinced that we are in strong legal footing. I have enough questions at this point that i dont know im prepared to move forward without [inaudible] supervisor agreed i want to get some clarity in terms of the faa. Its my understanding that their obligation is to manage what happens within airspace to provide the accountability around Public Safety and so on and so forth. Im trying to understand why we are taking on this responsibility when theres a mechanism to manage
Necessary, im convinced that we are in strong legal footing. I have enough questions at this point that i dont know im prepared to move forward without [inaudible] supervisor agreed i want to get some clarity in terms of the faa. Its my understanding that their obligation is to manage what happens within airspace to provide the accountability around Public Safety and so on and so forth. Im trying to understand why we are taking on this responsibility when theres a mechanism to manage what happens within the airspace, whether for Public Safety reasons he says or what have you. John giving a deputy City Attorney. I dont know if this question really for me or for the department i want to my biggest concern has to do with the legalities of it. Because of my concern is that well first of all i dont think its worth it for the city to pass an ordinance that potentially we could get challenged legally by the faa. I am just trying to understand what i think supervisor kim helped a little bit wi
Terms of the legalities, including ideally we would have more information at this point. I know theres been a lot of backandforth with the faa. I do feel comfortable in terms of the information that we have received that we are on solid ground. Again, this is a very brief period of time this will be in effect so i am comfortable supporting this today. Supervisor can by the way, i do support a citywide ban on these aerial advertisements. Mainly because weve heard so much for a residence about how Standard Banner towing aircraft flies very low in a neighborhood particularly, the one around the giant stadium. Often you will have for banner planes towing several hours before giants games going in circles, and it causes a lot of destruction and Noise Pollution in this area and of course distraction. I think theres a lot of legal questions which is why on monday i want to make sure we do legislation that we get it right. Were certainly taken on legal liability and risk that we dont fully und
In this area and of course distraction. I think theres a lot of legal questions which is why on monday i want to make sure we do legislation that we get it right. Were certainly taken on legal liability and risk that we dont fully understand. I mean be ready to support this next week when im not ready to support this today. Thank you if theres no other questions we have a motion for the moment from pres. Chiu. Mdm. Clerk and we have a roll call on the amendment yes. The notion was moved by supervisor he already should have roll call [roll call] this is a note on the moment. [roll call] there are 10 eyes and one no thank you. Mdm. Clerk, my understanding is this what we continued for a week no mr. Chair. I believe this item will be voting today on and it passes it will go straight can we have a roll call on the ordinance as amended . Judgeship on item 39 as amended [roll call] there are five eyes and six nose ship the item does not pass. Thank you. Never a dull moment at the board. Item
But with that said, i dont think that the reason for us to just throw up our hands and say we agreed that we would pursue this and you know what, without their pursuit anymore because were mad at the americas cup. We agreed certain obligations. This is not some sort of agreeing to buy back some money. This is basic obligation of the agreements. Its also not an unreasonable obligation. In fact, i dont speak for all my colleagues, but i suspect there are number of people sitting in this chamber who may be supporting supervisor kims ultimate legislation that goes further in terms of potentially turning this into permanent restrictions. So, would this does it will restricted as pres. Chiu said, for only a month. Just to be very clear if we dont vote on this today then its going to go into after the recess and doesnt take effect until 30 days after the mayor signs it and then its after everything he becomes moot at that point. In terms of the legalities, including ideally we would have more