security so presumably he would know since assessing threats to homeland security is his job. but what he didn t tell us is hs defining this information here and so we have this new and terrifying thing. the biden administration is so concerned and create a new agency to fight it but mayorkas never hinted to what it might be. so the man in charge of disinformation governing board never define disinformation. it is almost unbelievable when you think about it. would you declare war on a country you couldn t name? would you sentence someone to death for a crime you couldn t describe? of course you wouldn t if you were a decent person. you can t have justice without prec that is why we have very large books of law that defines what is allowed and what is not. but they are not defining the core concept at the heart of what is effectively new a law enforcement agencies. maybe that is because mayorkas doesn t
so presumably he would know since assessing threats to homeland security is s he his jo butme what he didn t tell us is how he s defining disinformation. so you haveel this new how h and terrifyinge s things the buh administration is so concerned about that is created a new agency to fight b i it. but my orca s never said or even hinted as to what itit migi be . sot the man in charge of the disinformation t governing board never defined disinformation. it s almost unbelievable when you think about it. would you declare war on a country you couldn t name? send someone to death for a crime you couldn t describe? of course you would not if you were seen a decent person because you can t have justice c without a precise definitions. that s why we have veryer large books of law that define what is allowed and what is not . but they re not defining the core concept at the heart of what is effectively a new law enforcement agency. maybe that ss because america doesn t want justice and neither