Trumppth and breadth of support is greater than ever instantly stunning. We will give you a taste of what trump himself is saying about the pulpit here is about the poll. Heres a snippet of his interview with mark this money. Mark what do you think of the numbers . Mr. Trump well, im honored by the numbers did i see what is happening. We have to amend his response to what im saying, and im really honored. Im not that surprised. When you look at the crowds i get, nobody has close to those grounds, including bernie sanders. The response has been really terrific. I was really happy about it. Mark one of the things that struck me in the remarks yesterday, talking about the crosstabs, some of the more impressive than the horse race. Talk aboutwhen they the economy and when they talk about terrorism and when they talk about the military, the really important facts of life in terms of the nation, and i was at numbers that were many, many times everybody else, and so i was very honored by that
Former intelligence officials from the clinton, bush and obama demonstrations spoke monday about the Government Security clearance process and recommendations for moving the system. From the Wilson Center, this is an hour and a half. Good morning welcome bright and early on monday to the Wilson Center. I and jane harman, president ceo recovering politician for many many years, too many for some of my detractors. I spent time in the house of representatives working on security and intelligence issues and numbers of people sitting here are my friends on a bipartisan basis. Im very excited that we are doing something truly useful this morning, which is to host a Panel Discussion on security clearance, and nextgen overhaul. If you dont understand what nextgen means you probably should leave the room. Todays problems are digital. Too many of our policies and politicians are analyzed. Anyone who has held a secret or top secret clearance knows what i mean. Parts of our system fit the 19th cen
Think the islamic people who are not terrorists do not condemn them . They dont openly condemn them . Why is that . You have not heard any examples of that . There are stories in the paper that areut groups forming, muslim groups that are forming International Groups to criticize and denounce what isis is doing. Georgia, democrat, good morning. Caller good morning to you. I think the president s speech was on point. We are not going to militarily be able to destroy terrorism. We can slow them down, stop them from coming here, but we are not going to destroy terrorism altogether. Host i have to leave it there. Sorry for the abrupt stop. That brings in and to todays washington journal. We will be back tomorrow at 7 00 a. M. And now i want to bring it to the Wilson Center discussing the Government Security clearance process with a group who worked for previous administrations. I am very excited that we are doing something truly useful as host a panel is to discussion on security clearance
Representatives working on security and intelligence issues and numbers of people sitting here are my friends on a bipartisan basis. Im very excited that we are doing something truly useful this morning, which is to host a Panel Discussion on security clearance, and nextgen overhaul. If you dont understand what nextgen means you probably should leave the room. Todays problems are digital. Too many of our policies and politicians are analyzed. Anyone who has held a secret or top secret clearance knows what i mean. Parts of our system fit the 19th century like the paper timecards we are stuck with it. Not kidding. Bottom line if we want a workforce with secure and talented our approach to security clearances needs an overhaul asap. The way we do business right now and at least three serious problems. First, we are not getting the right people in the door. More than ever we need individuals with Language Skills and cultural staff working in National Security but its too hard for a native
I could never remember that term, but one means a disposition of people, desires or actions you might say and other rationalizations that these aims. The rationalizations change all the time. But the desires remained fairly constant. Does anyone remember the terms, drawing on pareto, i cant remember sorry. The point however is there is permanent disposition, which you called idealism which certainly fits and occurs again and again and events it seems to me not just arguments. Defense has to confirm burnhams analysis before people begin to take it seriously. Of course as a discussion about guilt and have guilt motivates much liberalism and in one sense that liberalism replaces christianity in a sense that youre right christianity was all the guilt problem for individuals that they were truly professed christians, which is a rather interesting aspect of the book i think. There simply emphasizes if you feel guilty then you want to help you want to do something. It didnt matter what you do