Read more about Social Media Intermediary Guidelines: Full load of what the govt announced on Business Standard. No safe harbour if due diligence not followed; platforms to remove or disable sexual content within 24 hours of complaint; Chief Compliance Officer post, monthly compliance report mandatory
Friday, 29 Jan 2021 07:13 AM MYT
Facebook’s newly-launched ‘supreme court’ issued its first rulings yesterday. Reuters pic
Subscribe to our Telegram channel for the latest updates on news you need to know.
WASHINGTON, Jan 29 Facebook’s newly-launched ‘supreme court’ issued its first rulings yesterday, overturning four of five decisions to remove controversial posts from the platform.
The initial batch of rulings did not include Donald Trump’s indefinite suspension from Facebook and Instagram after the storming of the US Capitol, but the board said last week it agreed to consider that case.
The four overturned decisions included a post that asserted that France lacked a health care strategy and included claims that a cure for Covid-19 exists.
deceiving. this week riyadh nearly threw down the gauntlet. saudi arabia announced it would not not accept three marmoset, tiny creatures, smallest creatures of monkey that were to be transferred from a zoo in stock homo to one in riyadh. they would hold onto these pygmy marmosets in case riyadh changes its mind. in this geopolitical game the monkeys really are in the middle. the correct answer to the gps challenge question is c, egypt. that s quite a change from four years ago when in january 2011 holy spirit any hosni mubarak shut off internet in his country to crush revolutionary demonstrations against him. egypt since made content removal requests but so have countries
dana, i want to talk about sopa and pipa. i heard it is supposed to curtail piracy. but they say it goes too far, and that s when i stop listening. it is the time to tune out. i think that was the strategy with who thought to buy the legislation. they put little strips of aluminum foil and the american people didn t pay attention. but people did. and one of the most disturbing aspects is an update to an earlier piece of legislation that is now responsible for all of the content removal you see on youtube. it is working perfectly well. this one would require paypal or mastercard to cutoff funding to anyone who has been accused of i m pranting and imprinting and copyright. it gives an advantage to large companies like via come viacom to shut down the next youtube. they will sue you so you can t pay your lawyer. i wouldn t know anything about giant media companys that would support this. i will leave you to be the expert on this. actually you take stuff