would this liberal blogger be in trouble, could the governor be in trouble? no, the liberal blogger is okay in the criminal arena because you ve got a one-party. megyn: explain what that means. the liberal blogger well, some states you have to have both parties on the phone, a 2-party consent state where both parties con sen. if it s both party consents, one party says i want my voice recorded along with that person. megyn: and the blogger called from new york state, the governor was in wisconsin and both requires the consent of only one party to the phone call. let me say who might have a problem. i think the governor might have a problem. i don t think that we can kind of brush over the final words of this long 20-minute conversation. i listened to it all. the characterization was correct, except for the last couple of lines, where he says once you crush these bastards, this is the liberal guy talking, i ll fly you out to cali and really show you a good time. and the governor
says you deserve it. now i m hearing back pedaling suggesting i thought she was shaking a baby and i then had to strike her. megyn: that portion of the tape has not been released but there is more to this tape according to radaronline.com. they talk about how knocked out one of her teeth and chipped the other one and she was holding their daughter at the time. first all, that s a haunting tape. you can tell it s raw, there is no lying in him. you deserve it. that s an admission. they don t have to sit him down and read him his rights. that s compelling evidence. the challenge is it was unlawfully obtained, his camp will argue because california is a two-partly consent state an didn t obviously give his approval. there is an exemption for
well, now verizon lets you mix and match your family unlimited plans so everybody gets the plan they want, without paying for things they don t. jet-setting moms can video-chat from europe. movie-obsessed teens can stream obscure cinema. it s like everyone gets their own flavor of unlimited. (chuckles) it s a metaphor. simile, not a metaphor. hm. well played. (vo) one family. different unlimited plans. starting at $40 per line. switch now and get $300 off our best phones all on the network you deserve. all right. now that we ve had a chance to have an audio expert enhance the sound, now you have a better sense i think it s fair to say about who said what. now we get into the why and what it could mean. let s start with michael cohen. he could be in trouble. why? because the taping is illegal? no. not in new york. you ve got to check the state where you are. this is a one party consent state, which means the other person doesn t have to know. is it because it s illegal to tape a clien
it s a one-party consent state in new york. what kind of i think michael recorded this mcdougal conversation towards the end as he had a bad time during the election, pushed away throughout the process whether it was with liewandowski and hope. manafort he was a little more in. when bannon came in, he was pushed aside and he wanted to protect himself on these payments. that s if i had to guess. now, remember, michael was he saw something like this coming, are you saying? i think he could have seen he needed to protect himself in case he would be disowned. look, he had worked for donald for a very long time. i had been through this a year and a half before. we had all been through this over the years. this is his practice. and he had a part of it, doing it to other people. maybe his eyes were a little
will they just not believe him out of allegiance to trump when this is someone they also used to believe? i think that s a very good position. good questions to ask because you asked a number of questions there. will his base believe this? the access hollywood tape happened when he became president. air force i, no, you ll have to ask my attorney, i didn t know about it. weeks later he admitted he knew about it. will it make a difference with the people who support him, will they believe him, or the people he s lied to, which is the american people? or what does that mean for him legally? you said you don t think we should focus on the legal part, but if you ll just indulge me for a moment here, it s not illegal to tape someone. in new york, it is a one-party consent state, but it could be unethical for an attorney vis-a-vis the bar association. that s a second consideration. even if they gave up the privilege ask they sand they san release it? that adds a layer to the