The same domestic terrorn÷ge o. The federal courthouse ambush that left officer David Underwood dead and the attack on santa cruz Law Enforcement that killed Sergeant Damon gutswiler. Multiple sources with knowledge of the investigation into both shootings tell us stevenzf9n carillo, who isogi÷÷ being held the shooting death of the 4n believed gunman in the oakland shooting. While the driver of the man involved remains at large. Authorities believe the van used is the same one they recovered in the benlowman attack. And they recovered ed ed a3fio guns and explosives in the zna cruz mountains. In an elitez . Air force unit bad specifically trained in explosives and tactics. These three recent attacks are forcing Law Enforcement agencies to9 make some serio changes to better protect officers. This includes newkgf9 protecti equipment. Santa cruz sheriff lori smith ordered new tactical vests and other safety gear. We know that ourd, deputies understand its the nature of the job, but w
Contrast, rather than as proxy voters, it is free to do so. In short, states determine how to select a electors and ensure they meet the relevant requirements and perform their duties as assigned. This means that states can oversee bribery as an incident, as a power to appoint. Tos must include the power remove and elector without a criminal trial. Under my friends position, as a practicality, ride electors would cast ballots and even legal votes. The state prevented him from casting a legal ballot. As this court explains in ray, the purpose and history of the 12th amendment reflected the reality that electors acted as pledge agents and the history of such pledges should be given great weight. Point,ustice ginsburgs and it is worth noting that people rely on such pledges taken voluntarily. Be of requirements would little value if not enforced. In almost 70 years since ray, states have continued to an act loss. Congress has consistently deferred to the Plenary Authority and no court oth
One who engages in a rebellion or one who would perpetrate a bait and switch on the people of the state by voting contrary to the binding pledge. Rather than as proxy voters, they are free to do so. The states determine how to select electors and ensure they meet the relevant requirements and perform their duties as assigned. This means they can oversee bribery as the power to appoint. This must include the power to remove and elector without requiring a full criminal trial. Under my friends position as a practicality, they would cast a valid and illegal votes. In this case the state presented him from casting the ballot just like it is an illegal ballot if you dont find it here in colorado. As the court explained the purpose reflected the reality that the act did as pledge agents for their Political Parties and the history of such should be given great weight. As the justices point about the importance of enforcing the pledge requirement, its worth noting people rely on such as this t
This oral argument is one hour. The Colorado Department of state i noted at the outset Justice Sotomayor is recused on the case. The constitution authorizes the states to use their authority to remove the elector one who engages in a rebellion or one who would perpetrate a bait and switch on the people of the state by voting contrary to the binding pledge. Rather than as proxy voters, they are free to do so. The states determine how to select electors and ensure they meet the relevant requirements and perform their duties as assigned. This means they can oversee bribery as the power to appoint. This must include the power to remove and elector without requiring a full criminal trial. Under my friends position as a practicality, they would cast a valid and illegal votes. In this case the state presented him from casting the ballot just like it is an illegal ballot if you dont find it here in colorado. As the court explained the purpose reflected the reality that the act did as pledge ag
House in the t first place. For example, that one related great, things like executive privilege and weather testimony of other witnesses should be included in the Senate Impeachment trial. In other words, house was to tell the senate how to conduct trial. Would the house has job to do, and friendly, i think mishandled it. But now they have no say in the way the senate conducts impeachment trial. Would and if, Speaker Pelosi decides to send them over here. Twelve weeks was all it took for House Democrats to come up with what they believed was enough evidence to warrant a vote on articles of impeachment. And i think theyre experiencing some buyers remorse. During that 12 weeks, we repeatedly heard House Democrats how urgent the matter was. Seemingly using urgent for an excuse for a slapdash investigation that they did. They now regret it. So the house concluded that the rest investigation and passed to articles of impeachment, will expected those articles that we set to the senate promp