Ewe unanimously, none opposed. Item number 89 is approving an amendment to the contract number 0804cmgc000 authorizing Webcor Obayashi joint venture to execute a trade work subcontract with pacific erectors inc. As the responsible bidder submitting the lowest responsive bid in the amount of 19 million 553 thousand for tg08. 4, metal panels thereby increasing authorized direct costs by 19 million 553 thousand and the authorized Construction Services fixed fee by 1 million 486 thousand 28 dollars. Do we need a presentation on this. Youre up, mark. We received we had four prequalified bidders, we received three bids ranging between 19. 455 and 28 Million Dollars, [inaudible] in this amount of 19. 55 Million Dollars, pacific erectors bid was [inaudible] but 5. 4 Million Dollars above our budget of 14 Million Dollars, and were commending to award it to pacific erectors for the point of [inaudible] and fund the balance from the reserves. This isnt the skin, right . No. This is other panels.
Meps were awarded late last year, weve been nesting the scope with them, making sure they understand what the scope is, we expect to get prices end of this month, early next month. If that doesnt work, we can turn around and bid them out in the august timeframe, were hoping to come to a conclusion with the existing bidders. Its a matter of we wont be able to execute the change orders until after the budget has been updated. What time of exclusion does that caoe create the total cost of the park, our estimate is 38 million dollars. The estimate for the landscaping package thats currently being advertised is 24. 5 million dollars. So, theres about i want to say 5 million dollars, theres probably more than that that were negotiating with them, but i dont want to tell them how much we want to pay for it. Is there a motion for approval . Move approval. We have a motion and a second. Is there any objection to the motion . Seeing none, it passes unanimously. And well note for the record that
No matters of the public wishing to address you, now it passes unanimously. Er moving on to item 10, approving an amendment to contract number 0804cmgc000, authorizing Webcor Obayashi joint venture to execute a trade work subcontract with olson and company steel, the sole responsive bidder for noshed amount 10 million 323 thousand 242 miscellaneous metals thereby increasing authorized direct toss by 10 million 323 thousand 242 dollars. So, as we open bids for it in january, we received only one bid and the board authorized the executive director to negotiate with the sole bid which was olson, [inaudible] our budget was approximately 7. 9 Million Dollars. We entered into negotiations and we discussed several items that we discussed with olson regarding theres any valuable engineering opportunities or Cost Reduction opportunities and we identified approximately 1. 2 Million Dollars in value engineering and Cost Reduction. This is the five item that is we discussed and we agreed upon. The
Lease for 9685 square feet of office space to 201 Mission Street in San Francisco for a term of five years and four months with ca Mission Street limited parlt ner ship. And sarah is here to give a brief report and answer any questions. Good morning, sarah jelati, i can answer any questions that you have on the staff report and our broker tony from dtz is here if you have any specific questions that i cant answer. First i appreciate the shrinking of the footprint, i know thats not always easy to do, i appreciate you keeping the cost down by doing so. My question is how you arrived at five years as a desired extension. Ill probably have tony come up and speak to what typical terms are. We were asking for three years and our understanding [inaudible]. Five years from now, three years from now, i dont know if that will be the case because theres a lot of space coming online, so it may not be as easy as we think, all we can do is hope it sounds like, if the landlords insistent, then we hav
When i was in seoul and tokyo and when i was in different cities in china, they were all asking how can we get more diversity . They realize this is important for competition in the Global Economy today. We cant afford a conversation that is backwards, saying how do we keep these people in the fringes. Because they are going to be there. We need to embrace that and see our populations continue to grow in the u. S. Two final things and then bring in the audience. First you mentioned the importance. The goal here really is citizenship in the end. Not just legal status. And that will require legislation. Do you think this executive action in the long run is bringing us closer or further away from a legislative consensus on immigration . No question i think it is bringing us closer. And to use the metaphor from before like gay marriage. Civil unions, the sky didnt fall. It was a necessary first step, not the ultimate goal. As i joked with friend, whats going to happen when gay marriage goe