To talk about what as long as elements are going to be part of it. Also to strengthen the perception that justice will be here in the hope that we can deter some of the conduct, encourage people to desert, discourage people in the opposition for taking an eye for an eye. Sure. In this respect, what would be your reaction, your advice, if in the fullness of time were faced with the following proposition. President Bashar Al Assad and 200 of his closest enablers are willing to leave syria forth with and bring an end to at least one phase of this conflict. In return for imunite from prosecution. Is that doable under Current Conditions . Is it unthinkable . First of all if we were actually presented with a proposition like this . Well, first of all, ive not seen any evidence that this guy, or the people around them, are ready to go. A hypothetical question. At any point. Thats often whats presented here. Well, if you gave the guy a bull tow or a place to go we could get them out. Usually t
With other companies. But its a very important but. But in a level playing field, and its there where the fact that they not took pemex out of the budget, and the i would say excessive intrusion of the treasury in many of the decisions of pemex, trace from because some of those middle layers and high layers, are completely unhappy with that you see. Okay. You want and we want pemex to compete, let us compete. But do not put us in an unlevel playing field. If you if youre really make an assessment, i think that the big loser of the reform as it is is pemex. Paradoxically, because one would say that within the mind of the government strategically thinking they need to understand that they need pemex to be the dominant company for quite some time, some years, for the country and the sector to keep moving ahead. There is the other thing is impossible to imagine from day one to day two and the monopolys gone and Everything Else is done by somebody by somebody else. So, and that is not, in m
And the more of it i use the less that we can use for dialogue between you guys and the director. Director comey is here to talk about encryption and the problems it creates for Law Enforcement. This is a subject that a number of people here testified to the amount of interest in the subject all over the place right now, postsnowden, post a lot of debates about surveillance reform. Mr. Comey has a different perspective about the impact related to the federal and state Law Enforcement. The format will be simple. He is going to give a relatively brief set of remarks. I am going to ask we are going to move to a conversational format, ask a few questions, and then we will go to you and use as much of the time as possible for questions from the udience. When i do that, we are going to do that, you know, as trying to do it in as uninterrupted format as possible. Please signal to me if you want to get in, and wait for the mike to come around, and introduce yourself by your name and organizati
Pursuant to section 702 of the foreign Intelligence Surveillance act. Section 702 permits the attorney general to join the authorize surveillance of targeted persons who are not u. S. Persons who are recently believed to be outside of the United States with compelled assistance of Electronic Communication Service providers in order to obtain foreign intelligence information. Although u. S. Worsens may not be targeted under section 702, communications of or concerning u. S. Persons may be acquired. 702 program is extremely complex. It involves multiple agencies, collecting multiple types of information for multiple purposes. Overall, the board has found the information the program collects has been valuable and ineffective in protecting the National Security. The program is operated under a statute that was publicly debated and the text of the statute outlines the basic structure of the program. The operation of the section 702 program has been subject to judicial oversight and extensiv
Public good which needs much more public involvement. Yes. May i add that i do think that what really is at stake is a competition of two systems. Our liberal societies and putins idea that hes going to use the time before we get our act together to export his liberal ways of running a society. I must say what you encountered in bulgearia in that he is targeting the weakest link. I must add one of the biggest problems is not directly related to energy but that the perception of the russian threat is very very different in western europe, in northern europe, Southern Europe and let me say eastern europe. In eastern europe, i think im worried. Im really worried that russia with the multiple tools in his tool box, putin using energy, all kinds of other tools to influence the Eastern European and Central European countries which he feels was once part of his sphere of influence. Its just not fair that they are now on the other side. Lmr. Ambassadors you asked fr a soft ball so i will throw