Property during that time. The permit in question was issued on june 24th without any review from the Planning Department as a result of that, the tenants were not aware that the permit had been approved until july 15th when the counsel fox happened to be checking the department of building inspection for another matter regarding inspections of the unit. The tenant filed this request for a jurisdiction on the same day after being notified that the permit was issued it was 16 days after it had expired, the reason that it was 6 days late because they rely on the notification, regarding the issuance of the permit and receiving notification from the Planning Department or from the permit holders themselves and the suggested changes are significant enough to require the approval of the permit and the change that the permit is seeking and including the foundation of the building and the floor joists. Tenant john who is a carpenter believes that this will take at least three months which is a
Them to the other parties. And with the exception of sibt 16 which i think provides them at this time. And recommended and this one here. Thank you. Make sure that they do have those. They have that already in. We dont have it here. We can hear from you now. Good evening, Vice President lazarus and commissioners and bradish, and the appellants have appealed the determination and request for exceptions for the 706 Mission Street project and in fact they have not alleged noncompliance and instead this is another, long line of attacks by a series of neighbors who oppose the height of this budget and we respectfully request that you deny the appeal and approve the action of the Planning Commission. And before i address the arguments i thought that it would be helpful to get the background because we have been talking about this project for a long time and we have never been able to present it to this board. The architect is present if you have questions. 30 Mission Street and it consists o
In a pending case, the Federal Circuit is primed to provide much-needed clarity on the economic prong of the domestic industry requirement at the United States International Trade.
In a pending case, the Federal Circuit is primed to provide much-needed clarity on the economic prong of the domestic industry requirement at the United States International Trade Commission (ITC).