52%, 39% want it repealed. it means that a lot of them say okay, well, fine, it s constitutional, let s move on. i would still like parts of it repealed. that s the argument the g.o.p. makes. listen, some of the highest numbers in polling for this we would like some modest reform. i think they would like something better. juan. here is what you do. bill? that s the point. if you want specifics, i can give them to you. bill: right. they want something better and so far, look. with all due respect to speaker boehner, did you see the clip? did you see the clip? i heard it 50 seconds ago. he can t do that he has got to look into the cam rand say this is what we re going to do. this is why it helps you. he can t be ah. after you played that clip he specifically mentioned medical malpractice. important. better than a giant horrible bill. bill: i m sorry, mary katharine. more simple take those and explain them.
bill: that s great. argument is tax you for everything do you and everything you don t do. good luck selling that on the other side say we don t do that. bill: in november we will make a choice in this country. yeah, like romney. bill: bernie goldberg on whether i, your humble correspondent, should be chastened from my wrong prediction on the obama care ruling. then is it legal on punishment for those kids who tortured a school bus employee in upstate, new york. see if you think the tanks they got is fair. we hope you stay tuned t do you see it ? there it is ! there it is ! where ? where ? it s getti away ! where is it ? it s gone. we ll find it. any day can be an adventure. that s whye got a subaru. love wherer the road takes you. wow, there it is
this is a serious question. i made the point that if you give the federal government this kind of power, all right? then they basically can use the taxation to force you to do anything they want. finance not just about healthcare. they can say you know what? we don t like the fact that you are buying from honduras. if you buy a t-shirt from honduras we re going to charge you two bucks extra. they can do it for anything he want to do because john roberts, juan, established a precedent. go ahead. last word for juan williams, everyone. i don t think that s exactly right. they could always increase taxes on imports or anything. you pointed out. punitive. they already have that power. punitive taxation. they can use taxes as an incentive or disensign disincentive. the legal argument is that john roberts has planted a seed here to limit the commerce clause in future because he said it wasn t legal under the commerce clause.
kim kardashian was running. the point man, john roberts, had to provide a legal reason, and he found taxation. one man changed the argument, but the chief justice has that power. allen barnes, melbourne, australia. what happened, bill? you pontificated for months that obamacare would be overturned. do you have egg on your face? up to you, allen. i correctly predict the commerce clause argument would be ruled invalid, and it was. no one say the taxation argument coming. maybe i should have. bob stewart, wilton, new hampshire. bill, you re a constitutional pinhead. it s not the supreme court s job to correct intrusive policy like obamacare. roberts is right about that. why i am a pinhead? i oppose the federal government imposing purchasing standards on folks. bill, my i.t. guy worked magic. we re watching you here. well, much appreciated colonel. i want to take this opportunity to mention that american deaths
colleague s comments. the chief justice crumbled like a dry cookie here and in some desperate attempt to preserve the court has instead made them look foolish with an unsupportable ruling that is only the law of the land because five justices on the supreme court said it is, not because it s backed by any good rational or any intellectual history that traces itself back to the founding vision of this country. mike: and well, i want to tell you two things, first, i appreciate the candor of your view and secondly, i hope you don t have any more cases going before john roberts anytime. we all do. we all do. mike: well, good luck with that. (laughter) i really appreciate your insight because it helps us to have this perspective from states attorney generals on the front line of the legal issues that really form obamacare. pam bondi, scott pruett, ken, helpful to have you.