all right. here is the latest on the olympic front. okay? the leaders for usada. that s the united states anti- anti-doping agency. they are responding to critics who blame them for sha carri richardson s ban from the tokyo olympics. aoc and jamie raskin, two democrats, they called on the agency to reconsider richardson s suspension last week. they responded with a letter, quoting from it here. usada does not make or have a direct vote on the anti-doping rules but as a wada code signatory, we are required to enforce them. that s called ducking the situation. bob koscostas back, again. my third handshake in ten minutes. i don t know when i am going to see you again. so that s a hedge. it still takes you to the rules and whether or not it is correctly applied here. i think they could speak out more forcefully. they did say they think it should be reviewed but they should speak out, more forcefully, about how unfair and
week. they responded from a letter quoting from it here. usada does not make or have direct vote on the anti-doping rules but as a wada code signatory, we are required to enforce them. that s called ducking the situation. bob costas back, again. again, thank you for being with us. i don t know when i am going to see you again. so that s a hedge. well they have to enforce the rules. it still takes you to the rules and whether or not it s correctly applied here. i think they could speak out, more forcefully. they did say that they they think it should be reviewed but they should speak out, more forcefully, about how unfair and officious this rule is. but they are right in that they can t overturn the rules that apply to the olympics. so who can? wada rules apply. so wada and ioc would have to do it but the united states hasn t gotten upset about this. and in fact, they then took her off the whole team. she can t even be on for the relays, now. this is what s interesting