government into a government of one. and, with designed it was set up to prevent that from happening. saying look this is why we re our own country. why we don t salute the union jack we wanted to prevent accumulation of power in the hands of the few or one person that caused us so much suffering prior to the revolution. for this president to do this was inexcusable and un-constitutional. one example you have, because we have co-equal branchs of government. what are examples you see, you think real lawlessness that ought to concern americans exists now. with this white house, this branch. okay. so this president wanted congress to pass the dream act. congress wasn t able to get the votes. president tried to implement the dream act without legislation the president saw that his health care law, obamacare was in real trouble. so, he decided
white house. it s as if democrats and republicans are still negotiating what the table should look like, right? as mike pointed out, you have this new line of criticism from the white house suggesting that the senate change its rules to prevent such impasses from happening again in the future. take a look at what raj shaw, the deputy white house press secretary had to say about this early this morning. we think the senate rules are candid. they don t make sense when you re dealing with somebody like chuck schumer. if we want progress in this country, we have to get rid of the filibuster in a lot of these instances. the white house suggesting that the senate should pass with 51 votes instead of the required 60. u.s. senators do not work for president trump. the constitution calls for three co-equal branchs of government but has not stopped the president from suggesting how the chamber might function more effectively. president trump spent day one of
where s your head tonight? i think the reality is for many americans, if you were somehow holding out hope that we were going to get some form of top-down leadership, you must put that away now. we must put away childish things. the reality we face now in this moment is that there is no agenda. there is no agenda, because an agenda is dependent on truth. and truth only happens when you actually have the trust of the people and the trust of the people is not going to be there when you have advocated the moral standard that we have here in this country. so i need individuals in congress to top acting as if they are witnessing this as we are witnessing this. to act as if they are the dually elected members of co-equal branchs of government. to go out there and say that we can reprimand this president. to say that we have reprimanded, you know we reprimanded everyone fbarney frank for helping out with parking tickets for a friend. parking tickets. we reprimanded newt gingrich for doing
attorneys generals, they have written a letter to kathleen sebelius about president obama overreaching. what do you think this they have to be very concerned at the state level. they re looking at a president who once said people had junk plans and were not in concert with the laws they had established. but because of political pressure i would say, the president comes back and says those plans now can be reimplemented. that causes a lot of consternation at the state level when you look at the state insurance commissioners and the real crux of the matter is, they re seeing an executive branch that has really gone about in changing law just based upon their own really whims. you cannot have a separation of powers, co-equal branchs of government that way. if there s to be a legislative