around the nuclear power station was extra. it would appear from these satellite images that it is almost certainly untrue. that there has been no significant change in the level of attacks, evidence of attacks since the las images were taken a month ago. so that really gives the lie to longstanding propaganda line, taken by the russians, that the ukrainians are trying to shell their own nuclear power plant to make the russians look bad. that s on the one hand. i ve seen the evidence on the ground myself that missiles are being fired by results troops from very close to that nuclear power station. almost inviting a counter attack. they ve killed people across the dnipro river. so in that context, one can understand the demands being made increasingly stridently by the international community to demilitarize that area. that is why the french president called vladimir putin earlier on today. because of the deep concerns of some kind of military spy catastrophe there. and a fr
you might be right, there might be more vulnerability down in georgia, the documents deal is a wash, but this is b.s. it has nothing to do with the campaign. this is a private matter with a woman. whatever happened to the left saying, who cares what happens in the bedroom? let s get the government out of the bedroom. now they are trying to get in the bedroom here? come on. jessica: bedroom activities for your lawyer? jesse: not to the campaign. if you read the new york times today, the op-ed, dana, he brought up the clinton situation. i mean, we did years of the clinton sex stuff, where did that get bill clinton? he got approvals in the 70s. he left well-liked and everyone agreed, everybody lies about sex. this is, what, not even lying about sex not even saying stormy daniels denied it after she signed the nda, and then she came back with her handout? come on, they don t have a love child like john edwards.
mar-a-lago case, that come into focus as well? well, yes. some of this is based on reporting that hasn t yet been fully confirmed. with that caveat, we need to note that if for example, trump s team did not comply with a subpoena. in other words, it held back information that was responsive to a subpoena, intentionally held that back, that s more troubling. that s deeply troubling. if there is evidence of shifting or hiding documents, that would be more troubling than what you had in the clinton situation. a lot of that deals with the situation that we ve heard a million times. it s not the crime. it s the cover-up. what did trump do once it was known that he possessed classified information? once it was known that the government wanted that classified information back from him. how deceptive was he? that s where he could be in a lot more trouble than clinton found herself in. and one last thing.
well, what he has said he wants to do is pretty simple, he would like to have the rules package they used during the clinton impeachment of 199 8 in which the senate heard presentations from both sides and then the senators decided that they needed to hear from some witnesses at that point. what he has said here, let s hear presentations and then we ll let the senators decide if they need more information. seems like a reasonable way to do it given that s how we did the last one and given that the democratic leader of the senate today chuck schumer supported that rules package last time around. he doesn t know, i don t think, when nancy pelosi is going to stop the shenanigans and send the articles of impeachment over. his preference would be to do this like they handled the clinton situation. john kennedy was on with jake yesterday, senator kennedy from louisiana, had things assessment, senator kennedy s view, he s just trying to be fair to the democrats here by not calling witness
there can be obstruction of congress when there hasn t been anything beyond issuing a subpoena, getting resistance skprgs then throwing up your hands and giving up and saying oh, that s obstruction. in the clinton situation, most of the litigation was with the independent counsel, and there were privileges asserted and litigation and litigation again and again, but the point is that the issues about the privileges were all litigated, and they were resolved before things came to this body. similarly in the nixon impeachment proceeding within the house, a lot of investigation had been done by the special counsel, and there was litigation over assertions of privileges there in order to get at the tapes and some tapes or transcripts had already been turned over. again, there was litigation about the assertion of the privilege in response to the grand jury subpoena that then fed into the house s proceedings. so it would be cleompletely unprecedented for the house to attempt to actually brin