Side of the ledger are going to our customers as well as others. We want to make sure we have financing mechanisms for Program Participants because not everyone has access to financing the balance of the system cost. We want to make sure were addressing that Going Forward, making sure were really optimizing longterm Job Opportunities for disadvantaged san franciscans, you know, working with Work Force Development folks. Were very happy to have this component of our program. But given the level of appropriationses and expenditures, 1. 5 million for this program, only 121 is employed is a fairly small number when you look at the dollars spent. And then we have a quick picture here i just have one comment on the areas of improvement. One thing id like to ask as an outcome of this hearing is youre obviously going to be presenting the budget to us in the coming weeks. Yes. I think it would be helpful if you could document for the public what areas what will you be able to improve in the com
Far people watch San Francisco and your right its exciting thought. Colleagues. And then maybe just so we know essentially were slording the process of continuing the Stakeholder Engagement to get everyone together and to craft and process this policy south poles soulgdz theres interest at the board of supervisors and we understand the mayor is a big fan and hes interested so i guess well so you would with those ideas its like presenting it for our mayor and board of supervisors to kind of take to the next step is that where we go from here. I will add their complexities technical complexities and im anticipating were going to encounter things that will slow down and how much rooftop can you share with the many variables and what if theres not enough room so we want to go through the stakeholder vetting to make sure weve dot all the is and cross the ts to get the technical aspect in the correct order as well as correct in general. Okay. And see once we have this kind of draft of the po
See you on the machine just a quick comment we talked about this on the policy commission had a discussion were grateful to you and the interims for all the work because its very complicated and there are a number of people that want to make sure we are not requiring one hundred percent of roof panels people really want to have living roofs for habitat and water managed and people that point roofdecks to be up high and see the view i know its complicated but i hope we work out the outdoors so they can took place i totally support in resolution were studying it and doing things as appropriate but boy is it complicated and any rough timeline on the approval process. Im hoping to have a final draft by late fall. But thats really a guess in the dark. There are so many unknowns and barriers because its the first time through. Were very cognizant of all the other uses and add into our awareness and concern title 24 requires that a certain percentage of commercial and residential roofs are so
A senator mr. President . The presiding officer the senator from delaware. Mr. Coons i ask unanimous consent that the quorum call be vitiated. The presiding officer without objection. Mr. Coons mr. President , i come to the floor once again today to talk about jobs, about manufacturing jobs, manufacturing jobs as we all know are high quality jobs. Manufacturing jobs come with higher pay and higher benefits. Manufacturing jobs help create other local Service Sector jobs and manufacturing jobs contribute more to the local economy than jobs in any other sector. And beyond that, mr. President , manufacturers invest the most of any industry sector in research and development, something critical to americas continued growth and our security as a leading innovation economy. So last week, 21 Senate Colleagues and i joined in a new initiative, the manufacturing jobs for america initiative, to help create good manufacturing jobs here at home today and tomorrow. Its grown now to 25 senators whove
Meeting of the local Agency Formation commission. My name is david campos and i am the chair of the commission. We are joined by the clerk linda wong and i want to thank the San Francisco gtv staff for the coverage of this meeting. Madam clerk, if you can please call item number two, roll call. Supervisor avalos, absent. Supervisor olague. Here. Supervisor im sorry, commissioner schmeltzer. Here. Commissioner mar. Commissioner pimentel absent. Chairperson campos. Present. Mr. Chair, there is a quorum. Item two approval from the minutes from the regular meeting and november 30 joint meeting with the san frcisco Public Utilities commission. Great. Before we take action on this item i would like to open it up for Public Comment. If there is any member of the public that would like to speak on item number two please come forward. Seeing none Public Comment is closed. Colleagues this is an action item. Can we have a motion to approve the minutes . We have a motion for commissioner schmeltze