can get rich helping china win, china is trying to takeover in terms of super power status. it is threatening the united states economically and geo politically, militarily. and if you want to know what part of the problem circumstance look within the united statesry have lmghts elements that have rolled over to this regime or worse. they are all over corporate america. all over academia, our politics, we the people know little about this. but this book, red-handed i think this will blow the roof off. what about bush family, what is their relationship with the communist regime? beijing figured out a while ago they want relationships not just with individual politics but with families. i highlighted in the book
laura: congressman, certainly we can do things to help ukraine without getting involved in a full-scale military conflict with russia, but we appreciate your leadership on this. turning outs peter schweizer, author of redhead, new best seller, how american elites get rich helping china win. you were on the podcast today with me and we discussed this, but with got to get into this aspect of the big tech connection, in bed with china, remarkable stories in this book, especially involving mark zuckerberg and bill gates. what do we need to know? yeah, i mean, mark zuckerberg has long coveted a relationship with china and he has these bizarre overtures. one of the stories i recount in the book is that the chief propagandist, the chinese communist party actually visits mark zuckerberg at facebook headquarters in california. zuckerberg gives him a tour of the entire building, then brings him back to his office. the chief propagandist sits down in his chair and he notices that
members. peter schweizer author of red-handed, how american elites get rich helping china win. welcome back. here is the headline. chinese elites paid $31 million to hunter and the bidens. you went through five different deals. what were they? that s right, bill. there were five different deals. a $20 million private equity deal put together. a $5 million deal that was arranged and then a series of other deals. what they all have in common, bill, is that in each and every case those deals were handled by a chinese businessman who had links to the highest levels of chinese intelligence meaning the vice minister for state security and the former minister of state security. and so what that means in short is that what was initially a story of cronyism and corruption we now have to recognize is an intelligence story and it s not just a
it s not happened yet. let s bring in peter schweizer. how american elites get rich helping china win. the title of your book has a picture of president biden on it. it points out the difficulties in the nuances here with these relationships around the globe with china. peter, your thoughts on how china is responding so far quite carefully walking the line here. yeah, i mean china is looking out for china s interests. they want an alliance with russia because they like russia s natural resources, something that they need. on the other hand, russia s move in to ukraine has united the west. they re playing at this time way you expect. they want russia to succeed but they don t want the west unified because it will make things more
0 activism and advocacy as it concerns sexual predators that stems back decades and that is concerning. you wrote your note on the harvard law review on sex crimes. your note is your major academic work on the law review prevention versus punishment toward a principled distinction in the restraint in it you argue and i quote a recent spate of legislation reports to release sex offenders by requiring them to notify local law enforcement and submit to civil commitment for indefinite term. many say it violates the rights of individuals that have been sanctioned for their crimes. the contusionalty of sex offender statutes depends on their characterization as essentially preventsive rather than punitive. you explain if they re viewed an punitive, they re unconstitutional. if they re preventative, they are not. throughout the course of your note, you argue they should be viewed as punitive and therefore unconstitutional. indeed in the second to last page you go through each of those for ca