democrats can t do it, it feels like the voters of arizona will do it. we now know that republicans are concerned a ballot referendum might enshrine the right to an abortion in the arizona state constitution overwriting the band and this seems to be some chicanery a foot. i wonder if you think they could be successful in that our weather arizonans are paying close enough attention here that it won t work? i was on the phone today with the spokeswoman for the campaign and she at least does not believe that arizonans will be full. we are seeing this sustained voter outrage and interest in seeing past the kinds of obfuscation that republicans are putting forward. remember what happened in ohio when they tried to change the rules, voters didn t fall for that even though abortion wasn t directly on issue and went on to pass that overwhelmingly. i think what you are hearing in arizona is people kind of scrambling, notice you know, that what the republicans are
what they want is for there to be headlines every day about how chaotic the border is so that they can score political points and so that it will help them in this election. it s just a mechanism to keep the conversation about the border in the headlights. i think the american people are catching on. i think all of this evidence that republicans are just interested in politics and are allergic when given the chance to actually vote for changes that would get the border under control is starting slowly to sink in with the public. they are definitely keeping the border in the headlines through their own political chicanery. good job. senator chris murphy, thank you for making the time tonight. really appreciate it. thank you. we have lots more ahead tonight, including republicans wasting no time to turn up a congressional hearing about anti-semitism on college campuses into a broadside against woke-ism. tomorrow, a continuation
legitimacy of someone wanting to overthrow the process that we re playing into then t co-wags of this kind of chicanery. like you had in the last part, when you have a lawyer, i mean, i don t know where you get a lawyer that sits there and says he fought for you, therefore you ought to do him a favor, not that the law should give him something, but it s it s like gangsters. you remember me, joey, from the neighborhood. i mean, what are we talking about if we are going to allow this kind of behavior to become normalized in the body politic? i think that s what they re saying is we can t normalize this, even though some people feel it s only going to galvanize trump s base. but what about theegd for law and constitution in this country? let s talk about law and constitution and norms, andrew weissmann. yesterday a group of house
willis. so what s really going to be interesting is when they make their arguments, the former president, in what capacity was he acting? was he acting as president, just a candidate, and certainly when they play that phone call, the 11,780 vote he was trying to get from the secretary of state, that s going to be at the center of all this. the question of where does his office stop and the political candidate begin? he s doing everything he can to sort of meld those particularly when you re talking about his candidacy to get his old job back. i want to read something that andrew mccarthy, who is a lawyer, wrote in the national review today. fani willis has a case. it s just not the case she brought. they seek to prosecute trump s nonviolent, political chicanery,
hunter biden is rewriting his plea agreement to. he was able to plead guilty when he was supposed to plead not guilty and he s working with doj to figure out what s next after they screwed up in front of the judge and got caught with her blanket immunity statements. while trump is dealing with all of this, hunter biden is working on another sweetheart deal that may fall apart depending on what s in it to. jesse: and the lawyer for former president trump said this weekend we should have cameras in the court room, this can t be a secret trial right before an election day. dana: i have had a long-standing principle, i am against cameras in the courtroom, false to. on the federal level, there s never been cameras allowed in the courtroom at the federal level. i think it adds to chaos chicanery, nonsense. jesse: chicanery? us before you asked the press secretary to bill clinton whose name was mike mccurry thank you. harold: democrat trivia right here. [laughter] us before he was t