Advice this need. Im cynthia goldstein. We have corey teague, assistant Zoning Administrator, who is here representing the Planning Department and commission. We should be joined shortly by senior building inspector joseph duffy. And perhaps somewhere in the room im not seeing is Amanda Higgins with San Francisco public works. If not, she will be here momentarily, representing their bureau of street use and mapping. The board requests that you turn off our silence phones or Electronic Devices and carry on conversations in the hallway. Rules of presentation are as followed. Appellants, permit holders and respondents have 7 minutes to present and 3 minutes rebuttal. People affiliated with the parties must be in the 7 and 3minute parties. Public members have 3 minutes each and no rebuttal. We ask that you please speak into the microphone. To assist the board, you are asked but not required, to submit a speaker card or Business Card to staff when you come up to speak and we have speaker ca
1703 for several years as well. So i know this neighborhood inside and out. I dont live there anymore, as i think most of you know, but personally, i feel very close to that neighborhood and its worth protecting. What i want to suggest to you is that you should find out from the Planning Department what exactly were the standards that they used . In 17073, you were able to get the Zoning Administrator to explain to you that the reason that he was willing to deny a permit, recommend denying a permit, while he would grant a permit on an excellent street but deny a permit on a good street, namely lombard, is because he thought that the distant views were not as worth protecting as the upclose views of lombard street. I looked at the brief that the City Attorney has filed with the California Supreme Court. The City Attorney uses two types of views throughout that brave. One, the painted ladies, and, two, the murin headlands. I would encourage you to find out whether using the same standard
Bobby wilson and rick swig. Deputy City Attorney will provide the board with any advice this need. Im cynthia goldstein. We have corey teague, assistant Zoning Administrator, who is here representing the Planning Department and commission. We should be joined shortly by senior building inspector joseph duffy. And perhaps somewhere in the room im not seeing is Amanda Higgins with San Francisco public works. If not, she will be here momentarily, representing their bureau of street use and mapping. The board requests that you turn off our silence phones or Electronic Devices and carry on conversations in the hallway. Rules of presentation are as followed. Appellants, permit holders and respondents have 7 minutes to present and 3 minutes rebuttal. People affiliated with the parties must be in the 7 and 3minute parties. Public members have 3 minutes each and no rebuttal. We ask that you please speak into the microphone. To assist the board, you are asked but not required, to submit a speake
I also lived down the street at 1703 for several years as well. So i know this neighborhood inside and out. I dont live there anymore, as i think most of you know, but personally, i feel very close to that neighborhood and its worth protecting. What i want to suggest to you is that you should find out from the Planning Department what exactly were the standards that they used . In 17073, you were able to get the Zoning Administrator to explain to you that the reason that he was willing to deny a permit, recommend denying a permit, while he would grant a permit on an excellent street but deny a permit on a good street, namely lombard, is because he thought that the distant views were not as worth protecting as the upclose views of lombard street. I looked at the brief that the City Attorney has filed with the California Supreme Court. The City Attorney uses two types of views throughout that brave. One, the painted ladies, and, two, the murin headlands. I would encourage you to find out
Deputy City Attorney will provide the board with any advice this need. Im cynthia goldstein. We have corey teague, assistant Zoning Administrator, who is here representing the Planning Department and commission. We should be joined shortly by senior building inspector joseph duffy. And perhaps somewhere in the room im not seeing is Amanda Higgins with San Francisco public works. If not, she will be here momentarily, representing their bureau of street use and mapping. The board requests that you turn off our silence phones or Electronic Devices and carry on conversations in the hallway. Rules of presentation are as followed. Appellants, permit holders and respondents have 7 minutes to present and 3 minutes rebuttal. People affiliated with the parties must be in the 7 and 3minute parties. Public members have 3 minutes each and no rebuttal. We ask that you please speak into the microphone. To assist the board, you are asked but not required, to submit a speaker card or Business Card to s