honoring martin luther king jr. all eyes , he did not respond to a single shouted question about comments made in the oval office in which sources say he referred to haiti and african countries as best whole countries, a pg version of all this. keep in mind the white house does not deny those comments were made, donald trump did take to twitter to clarify at least if you want to call it that how he sees it. here where his tweets, the language used by me was tough but this was not the language used was what was really tough was the outlandish proposal made, a big setback for daca. speaking of haiti he said never said anything derogatory about haitians other than haiti is a very poor and troubled country. a wonderful relationship with haitians, and trust. at this meeting, handful of different lawmakers presenting a proposal for daca. dick durbin, one of those inside the meeting, the conversation surrounded temporary protected status for some in the united states, the conversati
they give anybody that i hate of fox news came on the scene to identify yourself as fair and balanced the try to do that every day so people are probably offended or worried. we get attacked and we get copied usually at the same time by the same people. so basically this year we re doing something they re not doing so they tried to pretend we re doing something political but we have been around eight years we re not retracting stories . we don t have a former attorney general looking in us to see how we screwed it up. cspan: when did you know you made it on top?. i don t know when i knew exactly it was working with the first time we really beat cnn in the evening the announcement was in the newsroom the staff was standing on their desk cheering and these you will have a lot of spirit they want to win and they willa win.they re that gave me a lot of good feeling about the situation. host: team back to the first moment when this was an idea. guest: rupert murdoch and i was
for this? i am not here to the great climate change, i m here to argue away from folks who would sooner lose themselves in the cloud than ever get around to saving cash. they are still spending, we are still spent and the former republican chief of staff says this proves how screwed up some of these priorities are. as i was saying, governor, don t care what the views are. in the pecking order of immediate issues, that ain t it. it distracts from what really is one of the biggest priorities and that is spending. we re spending o at the federal level about 24%. that should be under 19 around 19 or 18. in 1990, when i was chief of staff that a president who saw the same problem going up to 22, 23% and negotiated budget agreement that had built into it mandatory spending cuts and over five years from the budget agreement he took a lot of heat for spending was back down to about 18.5%. so it can be done but it needs leadership from the white house. bipartisanship doesn t happen
i m not here to debate climate change. i am here to argue though that for washington change. away from folks who would sooner loose themselves in the cloudesi thann ever get around to savinge ur s cash. cas they re still spending. we re still spent. and john sununu is still waiting. former republican who was governor bush senior chief of staff. that proves how screwed up some of these priorities are. i don t care, governor, what people s views are climate changes but in the pecking order of i am maid i can t think pressing issues, that ain t it.i it.t is not only not it, it distracts from what really is one of the biggest priorities and that is spending. we re spending now at the federal level about 24% of our gnp. thatl number should be down undr 19, night teen or 18. it is not first time we hat a crisis like this. in 19, in 1990 when i was chief of staff i had a president saw the same problem going up to 22t 23% andha he negotiated a budget agreement that had built into i
for this? i am not here to the great climate change, i m here to argue away from folks who would sooner lose themselves in the cloud than ever get around to saving cash. they are still spending, we are still spent and the former republican chief of staff says this proves how screwed up some of these priorities are. as i was saying, governor, don t care what the views are. in the pecking order of immediate issues, that ain t it. it distracts from what really is one of the biggest priorities and that is spending. we re spending o at the federal level about 24%. that should be under 19 around 19 or 18. in 1990, when i was chief of staff that a president who saw the same problem going up to 22, 23% and negotiated budget agreement that had built into it mandatory spending cuts and over five years from the budget agreement he took a lot of heat for spending was back down to about 18.5%. so it can be done but it needs leadership from the white house. bipartisanship doesn t happen