I have another question. Just like to remind the commissioner, we have a full agenda. You say the current residents will not be affected. The current residents of these housing generally are elders, seniors, many housing, you do have Young Children. The Young Children it could be a couple of years old or teenagers. You know, they are currently residing with their mothers. Are you covering those Young Children too when they get older. When they currently, under the 29 properties, seven of them are designated as family buildings. Hump designate family . Seven. Thats just the designation meaning that if you to apply to get in there, you will be applying to those children. There are grandparents that are taking care of their children. I understand that. Thats the designation per hud. Basically if you are on lease on the property, then you are part this program. You are eligible for the temporary relocation for being on lease. We did run a huge ad Family Member campaign for the last couple
Should have. We sent a letter indicating our concerns and input. At the meeting, we also had ann hintton give update about the scan grant that we received. Which was about 10,000. The purpose of that grant was to have our staff mentor three other counties to develop their Long Term Care integration plans. Bill haskell who was our former staff person along with ann hintton worked together with three different counties in california. Specifically ventura, stanislaus and yolo counties to put together their Long Term Care integration plan. Theyve done that and now theyre going to be submitting to to the scan foundation. We completed the work that we were given the money to do. In the meantime, our department is submitting another grant with scan and so scan will consider our grant proposal to continue the work. The other item we had on the agenda would highlight the event that we had to commemorate our tenth anniversary of the down sill. That was on october 23rd. Maureen took a lot of phot
Me a concern. Not that i dont trust people but it seems like it should be accurate. Okay, thats something i will follow up with the agency regarding. Out of curiosity, it calls out in the outcome objectives 75 of all facilities will be visited on a quarterly basis, that would be two visits and same for the [inaudible] facilities. The baseline from the previous thing is that we require at least one visit to one board and care home every year so weve added this in as part of the increased performance as a result of the increased staff. Now the plan is to in addition to seeing everyone at least once, each quarter, 75 of them will be seen. We didnt go with the 100 po allow for a little bit of leeway there. Are the businesses announced and scheduled or unannounced. I believe both. In some situations the ombudsman will respond to a complaint brought by a Family Member or resident and appear unannounced. Ombudsman will make an unannounced visit to see how things are going and to speak with re
Disparity, which always causes me a concern. Not that i dont trust people but it seems like it should be accurate. Okay, thats something i will follow up with the agency regarding. Out of curiosity, it calls out in the outcome objectives 75 of all facilities will be visited on a quarterly basis, that would be two visits and same for the [inaudible] facilities. The baseline from the previous thing is that we require at least one visit to one board and care home every year so weve added this in as part of the increased performance as a result of the increased staff. Now the plan is to in addition to seeing everyone at least once, each quarter, 75 of them will be seen. We didnt go with the 100 po allow for a little bit of leeway there. Are the businesses announced and scheduled or unannounced. I believe both. In some situations the ombudsman will respond to a complaint brought by a Family Member or resident and appear unannounced. Ombudsman will make an unannounced visit to see how things
Says line 17 times line 18 i think it means line 17 times line 16. Would that be correct . I think thats correct, yes. And the actual calculation is not 15 , its something slightly less that that so im not sure why there would be it seems like a simple calculation, 15 of that perhaps it was a rounding. I dont have a calculator. Its about 14. 7 across the budget, so maybe its a rounding thing but it was an odd dollar amount when i made the cal cow cuelation. Im not sure why theres a disparity, which always causes me a concern. Not that i dont trust people but it seems like it should be accurate. Okay, thats something i will follow up with the agency regarding. Out of curiosity, it calls out in the outcome objectives 75 of all facilities will be visited on a quarterly basis, that would be two visits and same for the [inaudible] facilities. The baseline from the previous thing is that we require at least one visit to one board and care home every year so weve added this in as part of the