up or to threaten them and get them into line it up or to threaten them and get them into line. .., , , up or to threaten them and get them into line. .. , , ., ., , into line. it can be very dangerous for people into line. it can be very dangerous for people to into line. it can be very dangerous for people to speak into line. it can be very dangerous for people to speak out into line. it can be very dangerous for people to speak out about - for people to speak out about organised crime and drug traffickers and the bulls are getting information about cashman wasn“t information about cashman wasn t easy and about organised crime, even tougher. however, this shooting of joey nee seem to have crossed the line and people wanted to come forward with information and police say they had a huge response from the public following her death. detectives were pleased about this and that helped with the conviction of cashman last week, but they re still a very long way to go. there are a
Olivia Pratt-Korbel's family have said they hope the schoolgirl's killer Thomas Cashman is "haunted" the by death of a "scared nine-year-old' for rest of his life.
you again, thank you forjoining us. in other news for you, the man who shot dead nine year old 0livia pratt korbel at her home in liverpool last august will serve at least 42 years in prison after being sentenced to life behind bars. thomas cashman had gone on the run after trying to shoot a fellow drug dealer. he also wounded olivia s mother. she said the killer had caused agonizing torment by taking her daughter s life. judith moritz reports. the teddy bear that cheryl korbel has been clasping at court is made from her daughter s pajamas. some small comfort as she arrived to see olivia s murderer sentenced. but in a cruel insult, she was denied the opportunity to look into the eyes of thomas cashman. he had been brought to court amidst high security this morning, having last week been convicted of the little girl s murder. i was in court as olivia s family waited for cashman to be brought up from the cells. we waited and then waited some more.
only the judge would hear the evidence and make a decision. and that move baffled many in the courtroom. it was a bench trial, so the judge cashman was the judge and the jury. that was a little curious, frankly, why he waived his right to jury trial. if he had had his case heard in front of a jury, i think he would have had a chance of convincing one or more of the jurors that, how could a doctor do something like this? i think he thought that he was so brilliant, he could convince the judge of his innocence. he wanted to go one on one and enjoy that experience. what made this case really interesting was that there were no eyewitnesses. it was all circumstantial. nobody saw him put arsenic in doughnuts and iced tea. it was not a cut-and-dry case by any means. we wanted to find out where