[ speaking italian ] amanda knox was free. amanda is free and sollecito, raffaele, too. in the fall of 2011, after these kids had been in prison for four years, a perugia appeals court threw the case out, overturned it, and they walked and they went home. while it became a time of celebration for amanda knox, raffaele sollecito and their families, the tragedy of meredith kercher cannot be forgotten. the kercher family has paid the ultimate price. i wish that they would not always go by what the prosecutor
perceptions come from. if you want to change perceptions, young black men need to change their behavior. we go back to what about chicago. you were making a point in the break about some of these issues. go ahead. we were talking about the fact that if the department of justice is going to single this case out, they re going to get criticized heavily. every day in courtrooms across the country, you have crimes committed against black males. those aren t being singled out for racist reasons. in some of those cases, where we mentioned the black panthers standing in the precinct with a nightclub in their hand. the department of justice didn t even pursue it, they refused to pursue that case. they re going do get a lot of grief if they refuse to pursue that case where there was clear evidence of racial animus, and they take the case where there s been the opposite.
perceptions come from. if you want to change perceptions, young black men need to change their behavior. we go back to what about chicago. you were making a point in the break about some of these issues. go ahead. we were talking about the fact that if the department of justice is going to single this case out, they re going to get criticized heavily. every day in courtrooms across the country, you have crimes committed against black males. those aren t being singled out for racist reasons. in some of those cases, where we mentioned the black panthers standing in the precinct with a nightclub in their hand. the department of justice didn t even pursue it, they refused to pursue that case. they re going do get a lot of grief if they refuse to pursue that case where there was clear evidence of racial animus, and they take the case where there s been the opposite.
topic, there are so many of these laws being challenged, it showed that 74% who were asked, do you think you should have to show i.d. in order to vote, 74% said yes, cutting across party lines, everywhere else, why do you think that the d.o.j. and other groups continue to fight this battle to take down the laws ch when the vast majority of americans think they are necessary? ask the attorney general shannon: we invited him. sadly, he has not taken our invitation. but he is always welcome here. one thring have you to take in mind with this case, the fact that the claims that the plaintiffs made were rejected, this epitomizes the claims they have made. the aclu sued georgia five years ago. they lost that case. one of the reasons the judge threw the case out, he said they couldn t come up with a single person who would be unable to vote. in the pennsylvania case, a 93-year-old woman who was the
everything, and i think it is a tough road. shepard: the jury could say, well, you know, he is just mad he didn t make more money. judge napolitano: he probably is. you know, it was an investment which he believes he was entitled to a lot more money. it is a question of, believability. who does the jury believe? in the test throw the case out, the judge reviews the allegations and the judge reviews the laws. and the judge basically said in this case, very well-known, very well respected federal trial judge has been involved in a last cases involving b.p. and the oil spill and the gulf of mexico, and a jury is going to have to call it. but, you guys are not just going to send your expensive lawyers to the court almost. you are going to sit here yourselves and watch all the testimony in this case. and then about after two or three days i will say, guys, do you want do settle or do still want to keep going? shepard: a bet on settles, randy? randy: great point by the judge. that is why