this raid on former president trump s home. lindsey graham is a lawyer. he is a guy who has dealt with a lot of foreign governments. it surprises me, again, the affidavit proves that this wasn t a rate. they ve asked for this information over and over again. carl rove said on fox, seems like the department of justice kept asking for this. so, he is spinning a story here. but what sort of would lindsey graham be talking about when he says it s not meaningful transparency? does he mean the team there wasn t much stuff redacted, he wanted more stuff out there? it s just politics, ali. we are 80 days out from the midterm elections. this could not give the american people a clearer choice. one side, the democrats, advocating for people, the people who were affected by donald trump s recklessness, the people that have benefited by our advocacy for them, and the legislation we passed. the other side is entirely interested in politics. they ve given us this frame, because they have shown t
mccarthy and senator mitch mcconnell have gone among. major men have responded to requests for comment tonight for the washington post. that does it for us tonight. rachel will be here on monday. and i will see you back here on tuesday. now, it is time for the last word. ali velshi is in for lawrence tonight. good evening, ali. what you just said, i m thinking to, myself we are not going to, we can be waiting a long time before those people respond. and can say something about that. it s kind of wild how everybody has gone suddenly silent on this thing. what you just said, i m thinking to, myself we are not going to, we can be waiting a long time before those people when you lost carl rove, respond. and can say something about you know you are in trouble. that. it s kind of wild how everybody has gone suddenly silent on this thing. when you lost carl rove, you know you are in trouble. you ve lost the game. alex, have a great weekend. we ll see you next week. have a great sh
leaders like congressman kevin mccarthy and senator mitch mcconnell have gone among. major men have responded to requests for comment tonight for the washington post. that does it for us tonight. rachel will be here on monday. and i will see you back here on tuesday. now, it is time for the last word. ali velshi is in for lawrence tonight. good evening, ali. what you just said, i m thinking to, myself we are not going to, we can be waiting a long time before those people respond. and can say something about that. it s kind of wild how everybody has gone suddenly silent on this thing. when you lost carl rove, you know you are in trouble. you ve lost the game. alex, have a great weekend. we ll see you next week. have a great show, ali. tonight, we are seemingly one step closer to a criminal prosecution of former president donald trump. the possibility of the twice impeached former insurrectionist of the united states standing trial in federal court seems enormously more possibl
he is a guy who has dealt with a lot of foreign governments. it surprises me, again, the affidavit proves that this wasn t a rate. they ve asked for this information over and over again. carl rove said on fox, seems like the department of justice kept asking for this. so, he is spinning a story here. but what sort of would lindsey graham be talking about when he says it s not meaningful transparency? does he mean the team there wasn t much stuff redacted, he wanted more stuff out there? it s just politics, ali. we are 80 days out from the midterm elections. this could not give the american people a clearer choice. one side, the democrats, advocating for people, the people who were affected by donald trump s recklessness, the people that have benefited by our advocacy for them, and the legislation we passed. the other side is entirely interested in politics. they ve given us this frame, because they have shown themselves and the way that they are willing to fall over themselves, and
methods. would hurt our relationships with allies. i think above all, it would just be a big stain on the u.s. and their ability to have any secrets under any circumstance. so it will be a big question to me whether they will actually pursue this any further, based on the sensitivity of the documents. and we don t know how sides that of the are due to the redactions. yeah, cynthia, the unredacted portion of that affidavit was already particularly damning. it kind of makes you wonder, what s worse information could be contained underneath those blacked out portions. so what does it tell you that, if somebody like carl rove went on fox news and told trump to stop speaking about the case, do you think there is a concern from carl rove that trump is implicating himself criminally because he keeps on having people speak on behalf of his lawyers, or is issuing statements? well every time we turn around. there is another excuse. none is holding up. the thing about the affidavit is that it