by us, why can t we ust land on the moon? , . , . ., , moon? in principle we could, but if ou re moon? in principle we could, but if you re going moon? in principle we could, but if you re going to moon? in principle we could, but if you re going to do moon? in principle we could, but if you re going to do things moon? in principle we could, but if you re going to do things in - moon? in principle we could, but if you re going to do things in a - you re going to do things in a sensible way, bear in mind we haven t done this for 50 years, with completely new technology it makes sense to test that technology of to the best of your ability before you try something dangerous like a lunar landing. space is not easy, we might be doing more of it now than we did in the 1960s but it s not trivial to go to the moon and land human beings there. the aim of artemis to is to test the systems without humans on board to make sure things work without humans on board, make sure things are safe
means that production has been down. they are reinvesting, but there is a lot of change going on and the uk needs to decide whether it wants to be part of this, or are we prepared to let uk car manufacturing die a slow death? stuart masson from car expert, there. here in the uk, record number of people switched banks in the last three months of last year. cost of living increases are thought to be behind it, as cash incentives led almost 400,000 customers to move their current accounts. up to £200 was offered by some banks to those switching their custom. however, that number still only represents a fraction of the millions of accounts used across the uk, so lots of people who could perhaps benefit from switching haven t done so. i m nowjoined by susanna streeter. she is a senior analyst at hargreaves lansdown, a british financial services company. lovely to see you. we can be very reluctant when it comes to switching things, can t we, whether it is our
people understand we need an intersectional movement of all people? first of all, we have got to change the climate. it s almost like if you are watching programmatic activities. today, we live in a culture that is infused with violence. we must change the culture of non violence that teaches us how to come together, get along, and be above the noise. we will never succeed as long as we are engaged, even if it s through our gaming industry, why can t we create nonviolent programming with games we play? we could do that, if we chose to. why can t we we teach in train, even when we elected our viewers, do we want to keep putting this message out there, or is there a higher and better and more noble purpose? not to distort creativity. we want to have people as creative as they can. in other words, i m saying, we
point size 5% immigration rates. we have farms that don t have workers that even republicans want filled with some of these workers. why can t we, we are talking about settling people on mars why can t we find a solution to this. this is a gary very very cynical debate. let me just try to break down with the dynamics are. so on the. hard right republican side it is a winning talking point to say that the democrats and say that president biden is soft on the border. so you re going to hear that made whether we see 100,000 people across that border are not or 1 million. it just works, it is just like calling a democrat president, we call crime. and so democrats then in response have just sort of played chess here and said okay, well we always are gonna say on we can we are crime as congressman are going to push me forward anyway? are we just going to quell those concerns? but as you and i were just talking about before that segment started, it is a fools errand for a democratic
apology. i have a question when japan attacked america did we insist they pay america for the damage that they did? what about the nazis? did we insist that the germans pay us for the damage that they did when they tried their imperialist efforts? here s what we have tried to do. as time as proceeded, we have forgiven and we have tried to elm prove. we are great friends with the japanese, we are great friends with the germans, why can t we, in america after having fought a civil war, where more american lives were lost than any other war we have ever been in, why isn t that a sufficient acknowledgment of the error, the evil of slavery. why can t we operate as a people