Sarah, its the first thing i thought of because were covering trump gavel to gavel keep in mind, we just heard a Sandoval Hearing in Donald Trumps case. Theres two things that this is directly impactful to Donald Trumps case. First prior bad acts evidence coming into the courtroom. The second, the Appellate Courts finding that Harvey Weinstein basically could not testify because so much was going to be allowed in on crossexamination the same type of argument would apply to donald trump at the Sandoval Hearing. Thats where prosecutors are told by the judge what can come in if donald trump were to testify, they opened up the gates. The judge to the E Jean Carroll case, to the new York State Attorney general, Civil Fraud Case because of that, donald trump will have a similar argument that hes hamstrung. He couldnt possibly testify because of everything thats going to come in on crossexamination. Its directly related to the Appellate Division decision that we just heard today. Did not see
Ac30, 60 begins right now tonight are three 60. Whats ahead for the former president when his criminal trial picked back up tomorrow, and the Supreme Court hears arguments in his immunity claim, also tonight, live reports from University Campuses at the end of a day that saw propalestinian demonstrations spread and grow. Plus arizona, were say lawmakers are trying again to undo there recently revivim nir total abortion ban dating back to the civil war. Good evening. Tomorrow morning. The former president is back in court here in new york for the first full de, a Prosecution Testimony in the hush money criminal trial. On time. Trump friend and former tabloid publisher, david pecker will be back on the stand, expected to continue laying out the socalled catch and kill scheme at the center of this case meantime, the judge, juan merchan could rule on the prosecutions motion to hold trump in contempt for his attacks on witnesses, notably Michael Cohen, his former lawyer and fixer, who made
Of a day that saw propalestinian Demonstration Spread and grow and grow plus arizona, were say lawmakers are trying again to undo there recently revived neartotal abortion ban dating back to the civil war good evening. Tomorrow morning. The former president is back in court here in new york for the first full de, a Prosecution Testimony in the hush money criminal trial. One time trump friend and former Tabloid Publisher david pecker. Here well be back on the stand, expected to continue laying out the socalled catch and kill scheme at the center of this case. Meantime, the judge, juan merchan could rule on the prosecutions motion to hold trump in contempt for his attacks on witnesses. Notably Michael Cohen, his former lawyer and fixer, who made the payments to Stormy Daniels, which his boss allegedly hd through misleading business records. The defendants meant some of his day today lashing out at the gag order. Hes accused of violating, calling it unconstitutional and complaining that q
Case, six case, we cant keep track as it as it as an american, you know obviously could keep this conversation going from basically another hour and i am sorry to have to cut us all off. Thanks you guys for joining us. This is a great discussion on a very consequential day, thanks to all of you for being with us kasie hunt, cnn, your central starts right now cnn Breaking News A History Defining De For Donald Trump in not one, but two courtrooms im kate bolduan with john berman. Of course, sarah is out today never before has the country been forced to confront legal issues at the same time, like we are about to witness for one, how far the boundaries of immunity reach. Four the precedent that question in just hours will be center stage before the us Supreme Court. Were standing by for the arguments to begin at the high court over trumps fight, to try to get his federal Election Subversion case thrown out. That is now up to the justices to decide as Special Counsel, jack smith is pushing
Years, the second since it overturned roe v. Wade. This appears to have divided the court over ideological and gender lines. It is a case about the near total ban on abortions in idaho. The doj sued the state saying the ban violated federal law that makes it mandatory for hospitals to provide emergency medical care. Arguing in some cases abortions are just that, theyre emergency medical care. And that the Legal Standard of quote, good faith medical judgment has proven to be too vague. That lack of a clear standard is exactly what both Justice Sonia sotomayor and Amy Coney Barrett tried to wrestle out of the attorney representing idaho today. Listen. This particular patient had to deliver her baby. The baby died. She had a hysterectomy, and she can no longer have children. All right. Youre telling me the doctor couldnt have done the abortion earlier . Again, it goes back to whether a doctor can in good faith medical judgment thats a lot for the doctor to risk. It is very case by case. T