And it passed without a whole lot of debate. This is the Second Time Around that the senate had gotten this bill, ands you mentioned, the bill is on governor browns desk. If he signs it, it means there will be a lot more parents vaccinating their kids in the year ahead. A belief exemption is to prevent vaccinating your kids, that will no longer exist. If it becomes law, parents will need a medical reason if they want to avoid immunizing their kids. After january 1, 2016, that belief will no longer apply. Advocates of the bill hope this means in the future it should cut down on the number of outbreaks of diseases like whopping off and the measles with visitors going to disney lands. And this is now on governor browns desk. Mike and keba, back to you. I am a parents and i have two children who are vaccinated. Lets say they are not vaccinated and wraps if i have a personal belief exemption . Reporter they will be grandfathered in but it doesnt last forever. Their two points in a childs ca
Administration that was in such a hurry, such a hurry, to impose its agenda that it neglected to persuade the public of its wisdom and then cast aside one of the greatest tools, one of the greatest tools we have in this country for guaranteeing a durable and stable legislative consensus, and that tool is the United States senate. Remember i think we all know partnership is not some recent innovation here, invention. American politics has always been more or less divided between two ideological camps. Today, thats reflected in the two major parties but its actually always been there. On one side are those who proudly place their trust in government and its agents to guide our institutions and direct our lives. On the other are those of us who put our trust in the wisdom and the creativity creativity of private citizens working voluntarily with each other and through more local mediating institutions guided by their own sense of what is right, what is fair, and what is good. Now, recent
Law and possibly changes in congress and the fact he didnt is a much more greater form of disruption and what is threatened, what could possibly happen to the individual markets in 36 states if the plaintiffs in lawsuits prevail because that also is a result of the president s decision to ignore the texas statute. Finally, handing out and making subsidies available to 7 Million People dependent on subsidies also makes it less likely judges one force the clear language of the law because as an attorney at the center for American Progress noted, judges are much less likely to rule for the plaintiffs in these cases if it means taking subsidies. Judges are human beings. They would want to do that. And what are the reasons and mammals came out and said one of the reasons the administration and its reporters are pursuing a strategy of delaying cases is because they are hoping that effect will influence the courts decision. Put another way, they hope that will prejudice the quarter, which is
Neutrality applies only to the internet providers. It doesnt provide to any of the other alleged gate keepers that tim has talked about. And i think its worth thinking through what happens when you mandate neutrality on one part of one level of this internet eco system, but cant or dont on others. Theres this recent dispute between you tube and independent artists who are not getting free access on you tube y more unless they pay for expedition of their videos. Theres any number of examples. And amazon and their authors are another example. There are any number who are as much gate keepers if comcast is a gate keeper for an author, amazon is as much as one for an independent artist. You can think of thousands of examples like that. And that creates two sort of important and counter vailing points that really have to be considered here. On the one hand it means that ain i mentioned bob lob logs law blog it would be really easy except that bob la isnt whats his name in arrested developme
The field and youre playing a different sport. You go wow. Today it is soccer. Tomorrow it is baseball. It is that stunning of a difference. You no longer are going to be able to protect your ability to one thing and go out there and it is going to be very frustrating to people and that is why the structures and roles of leaders are going to be so dramatically different. To re they are going catch themselves looking at headlights and they are going to get run over. A question for about relations. Some people think it is an institutional issue. Some people think it is personal relationships that you have talked about so much. Im curious, where do you think t falls on both . Yeah, well, i think they are related. If you go back in history and look at what president lincoln put together and we remember how good it was when he and ulysses s. Grant the last couple of years of the war, it took some painful years to get to that. I think that ultimately it takes really good relationships. It ta