Four motions to dismiss the False Claim Act allegations against Kaiser are pending in Ninth Circuit. Kaiser is alleged to have violated the False Claims Act by submitting inaccurate diagnosis codes for its Medicare Advantage Plan enrollees to receive higher reimbursements.
defense attorney david bruno and attorney andrew stoltmann. welcome back, great to see you. thank you. shannon: let s go with exhibit a, talking about the lawsuit, a complaint filed in california federal court monday, shosh yonay and yuval yonay claim the rights revert back to them, the widow and son, januar. the lawsuit contends paramount, which produced and distributed the sequel, did not reacquire the rights before releasing the film in may. andrew? they say that victory has a thousand fathers, but defeat is an orphan, and 300 million reasons why this lawsuit was filed. that is the gross of the movie. it is absolutely ridiculous. this was filed in federal court, i think it is going to be dismissed on a motion to dismiss, i don t think the case is going to last very long, and i think it is a classic example, shannon, of a cash grab. shannon: okay, so the family says the rights to the movie, i think in 2018, they got
this is not a final report by the january 6th committee, but it is a legal brief that they filed in the california federal court arguing that these many, many documents that he has declined or refused to produce should be produced and there are a couple interesting arguments. one, as you described is the argument that these fall under what we call the crime/fraud exception to attorney khraoeupbl privilege, which is you can t communicate with your client even if the president was his client and you can t communicate with your client in a way that furthers a crime or a fraud, and that s one way the january 6th committee says you should produce these documents. the other one is an easy document that these e-mails were all done on the chat university e-mail system and it s clear that these are not private communications and they should be produced. there are a couple of arguments that the january 6th committee
the filing itself is an attempt by the committee to force a lawyer for trump, the infamous trump, to turn over documents that he wrote they had the proof to turn over the election, and since their evidence points to criminal acts, easeman cannot invoke privilege to keep the documents out of their hands. joining me now is a former u.s. attorney and msnbc legal analyst. carol, first in this court filing, if the court finds the committee is correct and a crime may have been committed, then what? yeah, so chuck, there are a couple of arguments that the january 6th committee makes to this judge, and again it s important to understand the context here.
a group of investment professionals manages ben s ira for him, analyzing market conditions and helping him stay on target. he gets one-on-one coaching when he wants some advice, and can adjust his plan whenever he needs to. and now he s so prepared for retirement, ben is feeling totally zen. that s the planning effect from fidelity. new fallout after we learned the 2,000 page legal filing from the january 6th select committee, turning the heat way up on former president trump and his allies. a request to california federal court looking to unveil documents from former trump attorney john eastman, the committee laying out the exact crimes they think the former president may have committed in his attempt to overturn the legitimate results of the 2020 election. a member of that panel, congressman adam kinzinger, he was pushing back that the filing