number one, talking about marriage equality given that that issue is definitely there s a split within republican party. watching the split within this family not helpful to the broader issue of trying to build bridges to the lgbt community, i would assume. secondly, there s got to be just bad feelings. i mean, as manu was saying, people feel like enzi s done a good job. there s not really a reason to challenge him. i no i know she likes to cast herself as part of a new generation. that doesn t seem like an argument. even though she s running to the right of him she s really not one of these tea party challengers you talked about in your mentioned in your introduction. we had to throw her in there. you threw her in there. i understand for what reasons. yes, she was able to make news. get into the cable news circuit. when it comes to her particular challenge, i think she just said, enough. i don t want to wait any longer. that s a big difference between some of these others li
reaction to this ad. is it or is it not below the belt? two points, one, you said you re watching an ad at 2:00 in the morning is bizarre. in the swing state of maryland. that is not going to air. mark is right. he s been trying to track down where they re buying it. this was a creation for the cable news circuit. regardless of what it s created for. we re talking about the ad and trying to get a reaction from robert and avoid eed answering e question. it s not an obama ad. as everyone dusts off their white horse and get their footmen ready to put them on their white horse go through an ad we know the romney campaign is entirely responsible for. right. there is a new ad out, that if you re watching at 2:00 in the morning or 2:00 in the afternoon, you would believe that barack obama has actually taken away the work requirement for welfare reform. do you think that s a factual ad? do you think that s a true ad? let me preface this by saying there is not an independent person