Speak to you are breaking up families m. hard-working people. tucker: let me ask you one question. that is, why would a noncitizen, who is not allowed to be here, who does not have the right to vote, have a say in how the u.s. government operates? very simple. if you have a farm worker who is the hardest working individual on this planet, don t yous believe he has the right to have a say? tucker: no! by the way, i admire how hard you and i disagree. tucker: i m not against farmworkers.s. if y you are not a citizen, you don t get to vote. i think that california schools have declined in quality since i left. roberto, thanks a lot. good to see you tonight. well, mr. hernandez seems to have an unexpected ally in many congressional republicans who have avoided finding the border wall president trump proposed. one man trying to fix the impasse is senator ted cruz of texas.
This is all about changing that. this is about massive reductions in business rates, for corporations, and for small businesses. many studies show that 70% of the tax burden falls on american workers. so, by cutting business taxes, this will increase wages for american workers and create more jobs. tucker: just to take one snapshot, a family of four making 70 grand a year, not atypical, what happens to thatat family? they will have a middle income tax cut. the numbers, we are working with congress, working closely with the house and the senate on all the details. so, we went out with the principles i think we have broad agreement on the principles. on the personal side, cut down the number of brackets, simplify this, get rid of deductions, make middle income tax cuts, and make business competitive. tucker: so, the president on the campaign trail was not
Show host, she s a senior member of congress, one of the most famous members of the body. and she says this. by the way, maxine waters is revered among democrats as an oracle, a living hero. she has a very distinguished record in congress and she s done a lot of good things. i think you should ask her about that. she is a friend. i do think someone who was look, i was with chairman jason chaffetz in south korea two weeks ago. we spent a full week traveling through the region, looking at that situation, which is very serious. i think he is a serious guy and i think that what he said should be taken seriously. i commend him for working in a bipartisan fashion. we haven t seen enough of that. i think the substance of what he said is that there are serious allegations here and we need to get to the bottom of it.an if we had some bipartisan, fair fact finding, then, nobody would have to speculate in either party. tucker: do you not think that the fbi was conducting an investigation in
Institutions of higher education into a wild west-style recapitulation of the internet? tucker: no. we should allow some diversity of views and you don t. you are saying basically, these people s views aren t worthy of hearing, we are editing them out. why not burn their books? why is it different? what you are suggesting? [laughs] tucker: it s a serious question. qu you can read their books. i take the question seriously. the point is that a college has a mission that extends beyond simply provoking students with whatever material is out there.. there is no ban on studentsev reading ann coulter s books. tucker: but there is a ban on hearing ann coulter on campus. colleges, as you know, blame the speaker for inciting the violence of others who disagree. i guess my question, as someone who says he supports free speech, where is the punishment
Any kind of violent or disruptive protest of any leeaker of any ideological persuasion. i wouldn t defend any of that type of action. at berkeley, of course, the conflict is not just left-wing radicals being violent. it s also right-wing radicals putting on body armor and coming there for a fight, as well. tucker: okay, but the right-wingers, to the extent they exist, are not the ones who stop those series from speaking. they are 100% on the left. you don t mention that in your piece and you don t suggestt punishment for those people, if you are a mere free speech absolutist, what should happen to people who prevent people from expressing his or her v political views? as i have said and as i have made very clear in my public writing, i do not support anybody of any ideological persuasion forcibly shutting down speech. the issue is that conservative groups on campus have intelligently discerned a strategy whereby they invite speakers who are deliberately