In Brooklyn Brewery Corp. v. Brooklyn Brew Shop, LLC, [2020-2277] (October 27, 2021), the Federal Circuit affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded in part a complicated.
Addressing for the first time Article III standing in a trademark case, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit held that hypothetical future injury is insufficient to establish.
In Brooklyn Brewery Corp. v. Brooklyn Brew Shop, LLC, No. 20-2277 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 27, 2021), the Federal Circuit dismissed in part, affirmed in part, and vacated in part the TTAB's denial .
Addressing for the first time Article III standing in a trademark case, the Federal Circuit held that hypothetical future injury is insufficient to establish standing to oppose a trademark application. Brooklyn Brewery Corp. v. Brooklyn Brew Shop, LLC,
Brooklyn Brewery Corp. v. Brooklyn Brew Shop Federal Circuit dismissed in part, affirmed in part, and vacated in part TTAB’s denial of BBC's petition to cancel BROOKLYN BREW SHOP mark and BBC’s opposition to BBS's application to register a stylized version of the same mark.