the republican will play smack of farce. smack of farce. almost hard to say as quid pro quo. the question, the bigger question here, is bolton worth the legal fight? if kupperman is the test case for bollen to and the idea this is really a figure of how john bolton will testify is bolton worth the legal fight and time? democrats don t necessarily know. any democrat that thinks that bolton s testimony will help their case, really doesn t know bolton s history that well. it really could be a factor where he could help the president or he could hurt the president. that s the big unknown with what his testimony will be. we shouldn t lose sight of what we know, that is damming testimony from multiple officials, including the ambassador to ukraine. republicans will say well, he didn t have direct knowledge, he wasn t in conversation with the president. given what we read in those 15
along to let the board know what they think. you should have to say i m a bit shaken by this when you buy shares in a company that i know the risks i have my doubts whether mr bollen can do us. to do something like that he s in comprehensible buyer s chief executive in about a month who spearheaded the purchase of us biotech firm monsanto last year was defiant defending the takeover as the right move however the company currently faces thousands of lawsuits in the u.s. over possible cancer risks. there s no way to gloss this over the lawsuits and the initial verdicts on life a safe have weighed heavily on our company and there unsettling many people the four winds of freedom and. they re also unsettled by a number of studies the world health organization says and one that glyphosate is a potential concert risk while other scientists concludes that guy for sage is not