power, you have to tell the fbi. too many people were approached. would it concern if you there offer of dirt wasn t real but a fbi concoction? a lot of times they use informants if they have an idea this person is prone or susceptible would that concern you in this case? no. if they had evidence that individuals in the trump team were eager and willing to work with russians and they wanted to see how deep this ran, that s just an investigative tactic. stay with me. with he have someone that knows roger stone better than you. i watched his film. all right. there is how this is where the home work prep spreads out. morgan was behind get me roger stone. wall street journal s shelby holiday who reported on this new roger stone news. you see the headline there. that is the shelby bi-line.
trump campaign, with the possibility does it concern you that s the goal, or do you think it s a coincidence these relate to past special counsels? i don t think it s a coincidence that these charges, for instance, relate to campaign finance abuse, or abuse of power, or obstruction of yesterday, or lying to the federal government. these are some of the charges upon which individuals have already pled guilty, or are being prosecuted or potentially investigated. and so i think it s reasonable for people to at least be suspicious that that is exactly what s taken place. the other problem with this pardon ability, as you pointed out, is that everyday americans don t have access to the presidential review process since it s just being done by an individual who is bouncing off the walls in the oval office, coming up with the next great idea to pardon some conservative cause celebrity. no, it would seem, if you take the president s process as it s been publicly executed, you need to e
rod rosenstein knows exactly what happened and what s in the development requested by congress. either the matter warranted investigation and he did nothing or saw the facts and believes nothing is wrong. it s a ruse. i don t think it s a ruse. it s a step forward. we ll see how important a step forward it is. you ask if i was satisfied there s an important element. there s been a narrative we have been wanting to know the individual or source. we don t care at all. we have never asked for information regarding him at all. we want the under lying information. that s important to us. and we haven t bnt able to see that the department of justice denied that to us. i don t know how anyone can say that s a good idea. let the department of justice hold that close. let s let them leak it to new york times and washington post. not show it to congress. that s essentially what happened over the last three days. there have been does it
announce subsequent schedules for data dumps. you have also said quote let s be clear, i had no advanced notice of wikileaks hacking of podesta s e-mails. can you say you had no advanced knowledge that the hacked e-mails existed? yes, i absolutely categorically can. yes, and we addressed the john podesta question. special counsel mueller s, have been does it concern you that you vice presidehaven t be. the source is sam nunberg, how reliable a source is he? i have done nothing wrong. and i have substantial bank of e-mails. i am involved in politics.
extraordinary drawings of buildings in cityscapes from around the world. artists. even mooching is able to recreate from memory in incredible detail. about. the love to work another memorize it concern. me your hard work and love my job. the result is startlingly close to reality. but. i think that potent stuff and stuff it means is concentrated and. realized into memorized by my mind. as