in today s discussions reflect that. i followed an extremely emotional debate phil here in the european parliament in strasburg lots of arguments exchanged here last minute before that vote and then basically broad agreement for a landmark whole of the copyright directive to take eight and nothing has happened on this front and so there was broad agreement in the european parliament that something had to be done and one of the proponents of this reform said to me they ve really bend over backwards to accommodate at the concerns that were put to them over the period of the past two years they ve reached a consensus and they are convinced that this will help them to deal in the proper way with big tech giants who have been so far profiting from this a lack of regulation in this field so what happens next when are we likely to see
platforms so gary what happens next when will all of this be implemented. well the technically the member states in principle they have already agreed to this is so has the commission the european parliament was now the last step and so now it s up to member states in the period of two years to put this law into reality and then we ll have to see how tech giants will work this out whether those upload filters will be as bad as the opponents say the supporters of this reform if that they ve bend over backwards to accommodate as many concerns as possible and this law is definitely not the end of the internet as we know it garrick motus reporting for you from strasburg thank you. you re watching t.v. news still to come. a window of hope for abused women in jordan we take you inside the country s first
many cases hatred they have for a certain group of people that happen to be in power, that happen to have won the election, it s fair to say that we have to do something about it. bret: that s a follow-up to a tweet where he tweeted out facebook, google, and twitter, not to mention the corrupt media are still on the side of the radical left democrats but fear not we will win anyway just like we did before. the issue of social media needs big tech giants seems to be an issue for both sides. i was just going to say that. you see the president and democrats including liberal democrats agreeing on the monopolization of power by these big tech organizations. have a lot of democrats upset with what they saw was a hands-off approach my facebook, by google to russian interference in the 2016 election, elizabeth warren saying we need to break up these big tech companies.
silicon valley continues to be a place where a lot of democratic fund-raising comes from, where a lot of the democratic operatives come from and yet it no longer has that same shine, shining is to democrats at least democratic presidential candidates as it once did. bret: on the flip side of republicans were usually against regulations, it seems like there is a growing chorus about doing something about tech giants. this is a president who loves twitter, it s been extremely important in his campaign in his presidency. i think he once said it was like buying the new york times without any debt, it s a great way to communicate with voters. he supports this lawsuit. the reaction on the left has been to laugh at the devin nunes lawsuit but a lot of conservatives do believe that some of the big social media companies use algorithms and other technical ways to suppress some of their ideas and i think
sandra: elizabeth warren doubling down on her call to break up the big tech giants. money man charles payne is on deck on that. i believe in markets but it is when markets have rules, when markets have a cop on the beat to make sure that the giants aren t gobbling up everyone else and eliminating competition. check it out, our unlimited plan on the brand new samsung galaxy s10. oooh. premium entertainment on the infinity screen! people have seven different premium entertainment