that is us talking about gulf state franchises of british brands, but let s now turn to a massive us brand that has arrived on british shores, and if that is not a massive handbrake turn, i don t know what is. darren styles, you are the managing director and the publisher of rolling stone uk edition. what made you think that an all american magazine would work over here right now? well, a number of factors, really. i think politically rolling stone is fundamentally a music magazine. it has music as its core, but it has also always been political, sometimes with a small p, sometimes with a big p, and also about film and tv. and in terms of you were talking about netflx earlier. in terms of how people consume television and music now on a volume previously unseen, the range of choice that exists. i think as a commentary piece, rolling stone, then as now, does an amazing job.
political, sometimes with a small p, sometimes with a big p, and also about film and tv. and in terms of you were talking about netflx earlier. in terms of how people consume television and music now on a volume previously unseen, the range of choice that exists. i think as a commentary piece, rolling stone, then as now, does an amazing job. 550,000 subscribers across the us see rolling stone every month. and so i think with the way that the magazine market has changed in the uk, the music magazine market in particular over the last year or 18 months there has been some attrition and so i think a space has opened up for a more generalist title. and so the numbers point that way and i hope i am wrong. i ve got a lovely copy of it here. £6.95, comes out every two months. looking from the adverts, it is sort of aimed at quite high end, sort of moneyed readers. it is that who you
it has music as its core, but it has also always been political, sometimes with a small p, sometimes with a big p, and also about film and tv. and in terms of you were talking about netflix earlier. in terms of how people consume television and music now on a volume previously unseen, the range of choice that exists. i think as a commentary piece, rolling stone, then as now, does an amazing job. 550,000 subscribers across the us see rolling stone every month. and so i think with the way that the magazine market has changed in the uk, the music magazine market in particular over the last year or 18 months there has been some attrition and so i think a space has opened up for a more generalist title. and so the numbers point that way and i hope i am wrong. i ve got a lovely copy of it here. £6.95, comes out
it has music as its core, but it has also always been political, sometimes with a small p, sometimes with a big p, and also about film and tv. and in terms of you were talking about netflx earlier. in terms of how people consume television and music now on a volume previously unseen, the range of choice that exists. i think as a commentary piece, rolling stone, then as now, does an amazing job. 550,000 subscribers across the us see rolling stone every month. and so i think with the way that the magazine market has changed in the uk, the music magazine market in particular over the last year or 18 months, there has been some attrition and so i think a space has opened up for a more generalist title. and so the numbers point that way and i hope i am wrong. i ve got a lovely copy of it here.
were good faith negotiations. democrats showed optimism about the top with senator scott. realistically, how much can republicans be counted on to negotiate this in good faith? we all saw the movement in this country that took people to the streets and demand reform. republicans have just kind of diffused let the pressure out. we re not seeing the same kind of protests. where these negotiations really done by the republicans in good faith, or where they simply meant to drag this out until it s no longer on the top of the agenda as we now see? big p color me cynical. i think you used exactly the right term. the former mayor did as well. good faith. i don t think republicans were ever negotiating in good faith. whether or not tim scott had an ounce of good faith, we will let that verdict hang out there. the republicans at large had no interest in police reform, for really two reasons. defund the police narrative, whether it is accurate or not.