Good morning and welcome to the regularly scheduled meeting of the City Operations and Neighborhood Services committee. I am Sean Elsbernd and i am joined by Christina Olague and we will be shortly joined by ms. Carmen chu. Mr. Clerk, can you read item one. Item one is issuance of on sale beer and wine license for Mikhail Brodsky for pectopah, llc located at 748 innes avenue. Thank you mr. Clerk. To the department. [inaudible] hold on one second. Turn your mic on. Thank you. Testing. Good morning supervisor supervisors. I am from the San Francisco Police Department. They have filed an application with the city and on cite beer premseses for 748 innes avenue. For the purpose of this hearing the California Department of alcohol and Beverage Control seeks determination from the board of supervisors as to the approval or denial of this license. From the period of july 2011 through january 2012 there were no police calls for service, nor any Police Reports. The plat information located in h
The area. Its located in an high crime area and in the census track listed. Its in an undue concentration area. There are no records of protest with the California Department of alcohol Beverage Control and there are no record of letters of support with the California Department of alcoholic Beverage Control and as well as the liaison unit recommends approval and the following conditions have been recommended. First one, sales, service and consumption of alcoholic beverages between 2 00 p. M. And 11 00 p. M. Daily. Number two, the sale of these Beverages Limited to Ticket Holders only during and two hours prior to a bonified theater performance of the theater company. Its define that the licensee must operate a troop of actors for the purpose of putting on a performance. Number three, the sales of alcoholic beverages for consumption on the premises is strictly probabilitied and served in containers clearly distinguishable from non alcoholic containers and limited to the sale of no more
Department. They have filed an application with the city and on cite beer premseses for 748 innes avenue. For the purpose of this hearing the California Department of alcohol and Beverage Control seeks determination from the board of supervisors as to the approval or denial of this license. From the period of july 2011 through january 2012 there were no police calls for service, nor any Police Reports. The plat information located in here and 354 Police Actions for the calendar year 2010. The pemz premises is located in a high crime area and sensus track listed here. Applicant premises is not located in undue concentration area. There are no record protests with the California Department of alcohol and Beverage Control and also no records of support with the department of the california alcohol and Beverage Control. Department of recreation. There is no opposition from the station. Alu recommends approval and recommended to the california alcohol and Beverage Control. Number one, sales
This license is transferred from 533 sutter street second floor where the business previously operated. It has capacity of 211 patrons and 6 00 p. M. To for the purposes of the hearing the California Department of california Beverage Control seeks determination as approval or denial of this license. From the time period of october 2011 to october 201256 police calls for service. From the same time period there were approximately four Police Reports generated. This premise is located in plot 166 and 67 Police Reports for the area. Its located in an high crime area and in the census track listed. Its in an undue concentration area. There are no records of protest with the California Department of alcohol Beverage Control and there are no record of letters of support with the California Department of alcoholic Beverage Control and as well as the liaison unit recommends approval and the following conditions have been recommended. First one, sales, service and consumption of alcoholic bever
Prepare to present. And i called them and told them not to come because we had been told by supervisor olague whose matter it is and by your staff that the public hearing we are not acting on it today. If you could continue your Public Comment. Thats the point. That at such time that it is considered at a future, i just want that confirmation from you that Public Comment will be allowed when you have it continued. Yes, we will have Public Comment when its continued probably to december 3rd, but thats going to be the motion after Public Comment is over. Thank you very much. Hi, my name is sally stevens. Im the chair of sf dog. We support active recreational uses and adamantly oppose any move to give sharp park to [speaker not understood]. It is suing San Francisco to try to force us to close the Sharp Park Golf Course and give it to the gg a. The lawsuit is in the courts right now, but preliminary [speaker not understood]. This resolution will help their lawsuit. A cynical point by them