as a theory. is the idea that american men have gotten a lot more and gotten a lot more this is an outgrowth of that?ha does anybody argue that? that seems the implication but it seems crazy. any theory that is going to target half the human race is bound to fail. but this is what we see. it s very common in the university to treat men as almost the enemy. again, this is not typical of feminism everywhere but in the academy this is being taught. i now see the professors coming forth. the theories are in the air. i have seen a willingness to sacrifice innocent people. when we remind people of the importance of the presumption of innocence and being careful about false accusation, there have been some activists who said who cares if someone innocent people go down? tucker: yeah. we interviewed them.
polled people and said out of the thousand people if you are that fifth category in that long line of the, the long litany of the names you have, right. no one is going to be polled on this thing. but it sounds to me that you are taking an issue with some teacher saying let s try to bring it together. tucker: you are totally missing it. i m for bringing people together. ck great. tucker: there is something inherently divisive about making up an community without asking anybody in the community if they constitute a community. why would did anyone even ask, like who made this up? who is making these rules?as we have to abide by them so it seems fair to ask where did it come from?em it s not a rule. what you are reading is something that was created by teachers who said let s bring the groups in. we have the names. i m sure there is no poll on it. in the states everybody is run by polls but we don t do that in canada. tucker: you don t care what the people think in canada. yo
tucker: impose it on a passive population? what point are you making? are you picking on the prime minister? tucker: i m not picking on i m pro canada. i came to ask simple questions as we do in this country hoping i would get a straightforward answer. not finding one. pressing forward more gently, i politely and getting nothing. i am somewhere if you feel i m sorry if you feel i give you nothing because i m giving you the honest truth. most people in canada don t know if canada and would say if there are ten people in the county where the group was meeting that is a good thing. bring them in. if they are saying they have some sexual change or some sexual option that i don t know about, well, let s all talk about it. that is what that is for the media. ini have face for everybody to come invitation for everybody to come in. tucker: what bothers me look, this is taking place in canada so it doesn t affect me or most of the viewers directly. int i wonder because free s
generally shortened to the lgbtq, the community. there will extra ones they added in there. no one goes by that. maybe that is to teach kids the alphabet. but it s referred to, referred to it yesterday as lgbtq. some people don t know what it means. they know it means inclusiveness, it s a good thing. it s a question of tolerance. k tucker: of course. but i guess what my interest is the addition of the new letters each representing a new category. i m not against it. i m confused by it. i want to know what it means. do you know what the acronym stands for? what is the problem with it? tucker: i m not saying i m not saying there is a problem with it. i m just asking what it is. because defining the terms is the first step to understanding them. and then accepting them. so what it is? well, i mean you have got it in front of you.so you have me at a disadvantage.
squelched. he had the good. he had audio tape of an nypd sting operation and witness testimony. testimony from women thatst wanted to come forward. they said sorry, you don t have enough.o went to the new yorker and that led to the cascade of the after name and media entertainment, politics. it doesn t matter. every day. today alone three accusations. lauer, you had garrison keillor from nbr, and davis a senior producer at cnn. it doesn t matter what network or radio station or industry. this is going to be something, this is the story for the weeks and months to come. tucker: it makes it different when it s a media figure, though. media outlets by definition need to have some level of transparency because you need to trust them in a way you don t need to trust the people who make wheat thins. n you have to believe they are not lying to you. do we believe they are not lying to us? obviously not. this is something that the president has been able to bring up clearly. this notion o