Daniel Craig Stars In This Forgotten Sci-Fi Remake gamerant.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from gamerant.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
to hide his true intentions. he said he wants to make it easier to sue media outlets, aiming to overturn the 1964 new york times company versus silver supreme court decision. that case centered around a full page ad in the paper from civil rights groups fund-raising for reverend dr. martin luther king jr. s defense in 1960 describing a wave of terror in police actions across the south. most of the charges were accurate but there were some factual errors. they sued for libel, claiming it implied him, and he won, but the supreme court justices overturned the lower court finding that public officials must show that what was said was done with actual malice. it s also the supreme court precedent that fox news, by the way, is using to defend itself against voting machine company dominion s $1.6 billion defamation lawsuit. how s that for irony? joining me now is state
representative ben driscoll of florida who is the leader of the democratic opposition in the state house, and bobby block, journalist and executive director of the florida first maemd foundation. this bill, hb-991, i want to read a little bit about this and its actual malice clause. a public figure does not need to show actual malice to prevail in a defamation cause of action when the allegation does not relate to the reason for his or her public status. to show actual malice when the defam toigz action is fabricated by the defendant or the project of his or her imagination. the way i m reading that is let s say a news organization was reporting on a public official who used a slur, they could be sued for defamation. they could be sued for defamation if they reported it seems to me anything that was negative about ron desantis or a