push the marxist or democrat party radical agenda. they never talk about what it is that democrats are proposing with the vote, that is destroying. there is a ideology that has been in work for decades. public journalism, it means we journalists are citizens too, we have to provide a contact context for it. remember dewey, there has to be a social agenda, they love dewey, they talk about dewey, he has a huge influence in journalism schools today and education schools, today, it iss an excuse for advancing the radical agenda. they try to destroy donald trump, they bad mouth his supporters, they tried to destroy ronald reagan, and bad mouthed his supporters, they
push the marxist or democrat party radical agenda. they never talk about what it is that democrats are proposing with the vote, that is destroying. there is a ideology that has been in work for decades. public journalism, it means we journalists are citizens too, we have to provide a contact context for it. remember dewey, there has to be a social agenda, they love dewey, they talk about dewey, he has a huge influence in journalism schools today and education schools, today, it iss an excuse for advancing the radical agenda. they try to destroy donald trump, they bad mouth his supporters, they tried to destroy ronald reagan, and bad mouthed his supporters, they
push the marxist or democrat party radical agenda. they never talk about what it is that democrats are proposing with the vote, that is destroying. there is a ideology that has been in work for decades. public journalism, it means we journalists are citizens too, we have to provide a contact context for it. remember dewey, there has to be a social agenda, they love dewey, they talk about dewey, he has a huge influence in journalism schools today and education schools, today, it iss an excuse for advancing the radical agenda. they try to destroy donald trump, they bad mouth his supporters, they tried to destroy ronald reagan, and bad mouthed his supporters, they
his own probe, and his prosecutor pulled a comey, broke protocol, bad-mouthed the inspector general s findings while talking about his own ongoing investigation. so will those accused of treason and worse get an apology? the two men i rely on most about these matters are in fact in the news tonight. andrew mccabe, former deputy director of the fbi, and former fbi general counsel jim baker. gentlemen, good to have you as always. thanks, chris. good to be here, chris. andrew, what does it mean to new. you know, it means a lot, chris. it s not a happy day quite honestly because this is something that we have expected and been waiting for for two years. i knew that we had not ever done anything wrong, so to see the i.g. embrace the unavoidable facts of no bias in the investigation, an investigation that was adequately predicated for an authorized purpose and in fact one that we thought we would be guilty of dereliction
department of justice. years of ugly conspiracies up in smoke. no spying on the trump campaign. the investigation was lawfully started. no political bias. there were some errors made along the way and the new fbi head has a slew of changes to make but none of. mistakes were judged by the inspector general as adversely affecting any outcomes. the only arguable deep state activity today was by this president s attorney general, attacking the findings of his own agency and having a hand-picked prosecutor to justify his feelings about spying, doing his own probe and his prosecutor pulled the comey, broke protocol, bad mouthed the inspector general s findings while talking about his own ongoing investigation. so will those accused of treason and worse get an apology? the two men i rely on most about