that kept people from actually questioning his credibility. let me define what a leak is. it s something you love k that hurt something you hate and it s something you hate if it hurt someone you love.et he likes this and he says it s for patriotic value but he really likes it because it hinders our president he hates. kimberly: i think youou summed it up. greg: . if we go from here? i ll just be down at the bar. b kimberly: okay, bye-bye. dana: the value of a leak is in the eye of the beholder or the recipient, if you are a reporter. especially if they are forged documents. remember the pentagon papers? looking back in history, if you look back on that i can t imagine what it was like at the time but most students are taught that that was a patriotic taught that that was a patriotic act. even though it was a huge national security leak.t you have people that will defend ed snowden at any cost, including people that aretr
he s mowing his lawn as a tornado approaches. a small town in canada, and alberta. his wife was watching him and thought, he s interesting. don t you notice there is a tornado? he said yes, i am aware of it. i ve watched a lot of tv about them and i am monitoring it. this is how you measure your manliness. i go inside. dana: or your marriage. [laughter] greg: i go inside when i see a b. kimberly: maybe that should have been like, jessie s? greg: that s called irony. kimberly: clever and manly. juan: as you guys know, my kids think i am the least hip person in america. this weekend, i was introduced to this song and i want greg to tell me about it. play the music.
the most biased show you could ever watch. he s never gone after i ve looked at his show. he goes after everybody from scientology to other unusual religions but he never touches islam. he won t go after it critically. kimberly: lying aslan. greg: nicely done. dana: i find that twitter and cable news in particular everybody gets a choice of what they are going to say. if you want to be per provocative and delete a tweet, you can be adults but president trump s nato presence. he didn t say article five which, i agree, he should have said it. his national security team said he was going to but he didn t. fine, why don t you say president trump, nato needs to
london, imagine if people in london or great britain had gone after mayor giuliani after 9/11. greg: we would flip out. we would. juan: gee whiz, no problem here. if they had guns they would have done a better job of stopping this. everybody said wait a minute, if those terrace had guns, they would have killed more people. the police got them within 8 minutes, greg. jesse: the billy club was fighting the guy off for a long time. he would have been able to catch him if he had a gun. greg: you know what stopped them? guns, juan. juan: if they didn t have guns greg: no side can have guns, everybody works. juan: keep them out of the hands of people who shouldn t have them. kimberly: can our law enforcement here keep their gun guns? juan: in this country, it would make sense.
kimberly. if i hear russia will more time i can t believe it. as in the country sick of hearing about it? i hear people in the street, they are fed up with it. kimberly: it doesn t seem to be playing well for a large part of obviously the electorate and people that support trump. there is the abstract obstruct- for me so far, where s the evidence of any of this? there s a lot of big headlines and buzzwords being thrown around but there s no to suggest there was anything improper or illegal dumb between the trump campaign and anybody foreign agents in russia. the problem for them is, when this is in fact put to bed and to rest hopefully soon, what will they say? jesse: what will they say, dana, if some of these investigations come back?