The Nagpur bench of Bombay High Court recently held that a private school management does not have to write confidential report and communicate adverse remarks to an employee appointed on probation,.
Nominal Index [Citation 176 - 222]The Iffco Tokio General Insurance Company Ltd. v. Bhagyashri Ganesh Gaikwad 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 176A v. B 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 177X v. Y 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 178Anil.
Nominal Index [Citation 197 - 212]Raju Pednekar v. State of Maharashtra and Ors. 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 197Sardar s/o Shahvali Khan v. State of Maharashtra 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 198Satish s/o Ramesh Nandre.
The Bombay High Court has ruled that the purpose of Section 31(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (A&C Act), which provides for delivery of the signed copy of the arbitral award, is.
Court directs BIS not to take action against jewellers
May 09, 2021
×
The Nagpur Bench of Bombay High Court has restrained the Consumer Affairs Ministry from taking any coercive action against jewellers for holding non-hallmarked jewellery till the next hearing on June 14.
The All India Gems and Jewellery Domestic Council had moved the High Court against the government decision making hallmark gold jewellery mandatory before it is stored or sold from June 1.
On hearing the petitioners on video conferencing, Justices Sunil B Shukre and Avinash G Gharote, in an interim order, directed BIS not to take any coercive action against jewellers under Section 29(2) of the BIS Act, 2016, till next date, and adjourned the case to June 14.