carley: alexandria hoff joins us. the crisis in remain is the top issue at hand. when speaking about the global economy, president biden didn t use putin s price hike, he said this. russia s brutal war in ukraine and on our energy markets. we need worldwide effort to invest in clean energy projectss to ensure critical energy structure is resilience to changing climate. critical materials are necessary for clean energy transitioning. yesterday g7 announced more will be invested in developing nations infrastructure for belt and road initiative, which takes advantage of partner countries of the $600 million, the u.s. the pick up $200 billion. all this comes as former treasure secretaries recession is around the corner. a recession is almost inevitable, probably 75%, 80% chance within the next two years and certainly a real risk it will come sooner. carley and joey, you mentioned wall street journal of economyists with 44% predicting recession will happen within th
order to help people access the health care and abortion services that they need. i anticipate there will be more debate and discussion. or was interesting about the supreme court decision, it gave the authority back to the states to make these decisions. so now that the decision has been made, it will be up to each of the state legislators and people there to talk about their elective representatives about what their laws looked like. we also get a new look at how americans see this decision to overturn roe, from the yougov poll out this morning, it was 41% of americans approved, but nearly 16% 60% disapprove. 67% of women overall in the survey do not agree with this decision. you ve got washington, also in the meantime, still feeling the aftershocks on another topic, a week of bombshell testimony at the january 6th hearings. as folks now brace for more in the coming weeks, this morning, one member of that committee, congressman adam schiff lays out what he thinks the
demonize justices with these bogus ethics charges that really don t pass the straight face test when you look at them. laura: now, the push to, oh, we need new ethics rules and everybody like trained seals supposed to start clapping for the democrats, chris, what is that really all about, again they never had these rules, the whole history of the court, now suddenly they need new rules. why? right. well, again, i think they are just looking for any stick to beat a dog, as justice scalia used to say in terms of attacking the supreme court. this group would come up with if a justice bought a loaf of bread on sale at the store they would say justice leaves store with a low-purchase price item and say supreme court corruption. they re going to hold a hearing tomorrow in the united states senate laura, we have banks collapsing, waves of illegal immigrants coming into our country. what are they going to hold a hearing on? ethics on the supreme court
one, because he passed a law but, two, what it means that the entire united states congress codified this idea that no matter who you are, you can get married howard: how does that make you feel? it s a great feeling to know that you are legitimate, as we heard our colleague, don lemon, say at the top of the segment. but beyond that, if you talked to folks, what other protections can we do especially after the shooting in colorado springs, the shooting in orlando at an lgbtq establishment. the question we re asking is what can the federal government be doing to insure these lives are protected beyond just marriage. howard: the bill did pass with 39 gop house members, but the valve began sa turned out to be most of the media didn t focus on the president attacking the supreme court. listen, i understand why some of my colleagues here chose to focus on that and, sure, that s worthwhile, but the reason why we re here was because earlier
is if we have a national law. trey: thank you for joining us, i am trey gowdy, it is sunday night in america, president biden trying to salvage of midterms by attacking the supreme court, he is not bee subtle this. saying this in aftermath of the dobbs decision. sounds like he wants the issues on the ballot, isn t that when the dobbs decision did? return to people and the ballot, what is most telling when the president said this: if you believe that