strange, because we know peter and paul knew each other. in and around ad 50, peter and paul meet at antioch. they meet there because peter has come from jerusalem to see the progress being made by paul s mission. my brother. when peter and paul meet in antioch, they have a fierce row. you were happy to sit with gentiles. this is an argument about how jewish you need to be in the jesus movement. paul s big idea is that the jesus movement should be open to people who are both jews and gentiles. we were jews by birth. but peter disagrees with paul. see that you say nothing to anyone. you re a hypocrite. it s a bust-up. they part ways at antioch and they never meet again. go. after the argument between peter and paul in antioch, peter vanishes from the pages of the new testament. this is the last that we hear of him. according to catholic
for the catholic church? the new testament says nothing explicitly about peter coming to rome, and i think a lot of people would be surprised to find this out. the apostle paul, who we know lived in rome and whose letters make up half of the new testament, doesn t refer to peter being in the city once. he doesn t seem to know of him. he doesn t mention any connection between the christians there in the city and peter, and that s kind of an interesting omission. so if peter s there in the city, why doesn t paul say anything about him at all? the omission is all the more strange because we know peter and paul knew each other. in and around ad 50, peter and paul meet at antioch. they meet there because peter has come from jerusalem to see the progress being made by paul s mission. my brother.
peter s. it is at the core of roman catholicism. but did peter travel to the dome to lay foundations for the catholic church? it says nothing explicitly about peter coming to rome. and i think a lot of people would be surprised to find this out. the apostle paul, who we know lived in rome, and whose letters make up half of the new testament, doesn t refer to peter being in the city once. he doesn t seem to know of him. he doesn t mention any connection between the christians there in the city and peter. and that s kind of interesting omission. so if peter is there in the city, why doesn t paul say anything about him at all? the omission is all the more strange, because we know peter and paul knew each other. in and around 850, peter and paul meet at antioch. they meet there, because peter has come from jerusalem to see the progress being made by paul s mission. my brother. when peter and paul meet in
in the dome over st. peters. it is at the core of roman catholicism. did peter really travel to rome to lay the foundations for the catholic church? the new testament says nothing explicitly about peter coming to rome and i think a lot of people will be surprised to find this out. the apostle paul who we know lived in rome and whose letters make up half of the new testament doesn t refer to peter being in the city once. he doesn t seem to know of him. he doesn t mention any connection between the christians there in the city and peter and that s kind of interesting omission. so if peter is there in the city, why doesn t paul say anything about him at all? the omission is all the more strange because we know peter and paul knew each other. in and around a.d. 50 peter and paul meet at antioch. they meet there because peter has come from jerusalem to see the progress being made by paul s mission. my brother.