Good afternoon. Were now going to start the first afternoon session. And the topic, again, is theirst foreign Intelligence Surveillance court. Were pleased to have as witnesses james baker whoshave formerly with the department of Justice Office of intelligence and policy review, judge james carr, whos senior federal judge with the United States District Court of the Northern District of ohio and formerly a judge from 20022008 and marc civillingier zwillinger who is a former doj attorney in the crime and intellectual property section. Rt i understand that each of you have brief prepared remark, so please go ahead, and afterwards we will have, as we did on the last panel be, rounds of questioning, five minutes, thisa time for each of the board members. But please go ahead. Id like to thank the board for inviting me back. Its truly an honor to be here, and its an honor to be able ton discuss these cieps of issues ie this type of setting, so ith appreciate the opportunity. I justes have a
Minimize the effect of these cuts on Indian Country. But we need your help to talk to congress. Its congress who has to take action on a realistic budget. Getting rid of sequestration and preventing the next round of arbitrary cuts having a potentially devastating impact. Last year, at this conference, i was able to announce the signing, and youve heard from general shin of the reimbursement agreement. Something you worked on for a long time. So far, have received nearly a Million Dollars in reimbursement because of the agreement. That means more resources to serve more people in Indian Country. Weve been working on a number of fronts to make sure your voices are heard in both state level and federal decision making. And as i said at hhs, weve created a Department Wide secretarys triable advisory committee. In fact, were meeting tomorrow. And i continue to urge other colleagues throughout the cabinet to look at that model because the stack meets three times a year. Not justice with me,
Is is what is the aspiration we have for the vexes problems, and the thought process and the first thing well do is ill use my conventional forces, and if that fails, use strategic forces. I tell you, its going to turn around. Dont think about it in a nuclear sense, but think strategic first, coming from great distance or no distance, to solve a problem. Last, think about the conventional forces and moving and huge costs of standing armies and moving them to the problem. Its just the reality we have to deal with, and how were going to do that, how are we going to afford it, those are the the questions, i think, that were going to, as an alliance, come to grips with and understand how to do that; ours, were not matching resources and capabilities with the security that we desire to have. Thank you. Other than that im in a good place. That leaves a good place. The leading expert brings a dose of reality, make it a concern, particularly such with europe. When you hear those speakers, part
In terms of the physical place to live, she said in the famous interview with theodore white, the camelot interview the week after the assassination said she wanted to live with my children in the places i lived with jack. Georgetown and on the cape. She could have gone to the cape. She went to georgetown. Avril larriman loaned his home and she bought a home across the street. It was inundated with tourist buses, tourists, photographers, peeping into her windows and coming up on the porch. She couldnt bear it. After a relative few months, she took off for new york and spent the rest of her time there. Did mrs. Kennedy have to testify for the Warren Commission . She did. She did. June of 1964, earl warren and one or two others came to her parlor in georgetown and asked her about the motorcade. It was brief, i think it was less than a half an hour, but she did have to testify. Thats on the record. Some of her physical description was wounding and kept for sometime because it was too grap
3880, for the mountain pacific 3881. 202585 you can post on twitter or facebook and email us at journal cspan. Org. In the Washington Post we want to hear from all of you this morning, what do you think . Who are your leading candidates . Republicans only. We did democrats only yesterday, talking about the next election cycle for 2014 and 2016. Today, the white house in 2016. Back to the Washington Post what do you think about who are the leading gop contenders for 2016 . Times york vote is only this morning, who are your leading gop candidates for president in 2016 . In thel has written up , saying thest plagiarism charges may hinder the candidate. The senator this week in a hearing, while talking about drawing tourist back to that is the republican senator taking a jab at Chris Christie, who was reelected in a second term in a landslide last week. And that the Boston Sunday Globe this morning has a profile piece talking about the white house and the candidates for it. There have been