David i began to take on the life of being an interviewer even though i had a day job of running a private equity firm. [david reading onscreen text] [inaudible dialogue] david general, thank you very much for coming. Pleasure. Thanks. Great to be with you. Now, you served our country very honorably for quite a while in government. Were gonna talk about that. But now youre in something that i consider a higher calling of mankind, private equity. [all laugh] how do you compare being in the military and leading troops to private equity . Well, im not sure i would agree wholeheartedly with that. Although i feel very privileged to be in the private equity business and also to be active in academia, in speaking, with startups and so forth. I think its pretty hard to top the extraordinary privilege of serving ones country in uniform, particularly if youre leading our soldiers, sailors, airmen, marines in combat. Youre very famous for staying in shape. Now, you told me this morning you alread
There are 68 different types of cancers that have been diagnosed while from the dust when the towers collapsed. Officials say they have taken the lives of survivors because they were given underlying conditions from that dust. Theres a move now to try to get coronavirus classified a as a 91 related ailment because the thinking is if these people did not have those underlying ailments from that day 19 years ago today, they wouldve not gotten so sick for being so susceptible to coronavirus. Yet again later tonight, the tribute in light, the beams that pierced the night sky will again be illuminated. A very stark and emotional reminder, melissa, of what happened here nearly two decades ago. And about the threat that sadly still exists. From ground zero. Back to you in the studio. Melissa those images arent any easier even after all this time. Thank you, eric. This is outnumbered and i am melissa francis. Here today is harris faulkner, fox news correspondent gillian turner, the host of ken
My wife is an archivist, so i got archivist at home that i have to mind as well as the field as well. The archivist are again are indispensable to what we do in the field of civil war history, in particular. Youd be hard pressed to find a book that doesnt have the imprint of trevor. He knows the collections exceeding only well, and thats whats so crucial. When you work with an archivist, you want someone who can do more than just pull the records off the dusty shelves. Youve got to have somebody who really understands that and knows something about what youre working on. Theyve got to know the field. And trevor does just that. So he has a very again, valuable, Important Role in the field of civil war history. Hes probably some if you want to see some of his work, you should go to prolog. Prolog is the national archive. Its the blog so you can see some of the stuff that hes done there. I remember years ago that trevor did a piece on civil war desertion. That was fantastic. Trevor also i
Office, no members of the president s party would cast a vote to actually convict him of the articles of impeachment and remove him from office. No senator from the president s party would vote to convict him. That was the one president ial impeachment we had in the 1800s. In the 19th century. Then we had one president ial impeachment in the next century. In the 1900s, the impeachment of president bill clinton. And again, like when Andrew Johnson, it was mostly a Party Line Vote in the house. When the house voted to impeach him. When they passed the articles of impeachment against president clinton. Mostly party line. Just a few crossovers. But when those articles of impeachment went over to the u. S. Senate and they had to vote there on whether or not to convict him and remove him from office, just like it was with president Andrew Johnson in the previous century, the exact same pattern helped. No member of president clintons own party would cast a vote to actually convict him on any
President s party would cast a vote to actually convict him of the articles of impeachment and remove him from office. No senator from the president s party would vote to convict him. That was the one president ial impeachment we had in the 1800s. In the 19th century. Then we had one president ial impeachment in the next century, in the 19 hupps 1900s, in the 20th centery, the impeachment of president bill clinton. And again, like when Andrew Johnson, it was mostly a Party Line Vote in the house. When the house voted to impeach him. When they passed the articles of impeachment against president clinton. Mostly party line. Just a few crossovers. But when those articles of impeachment went over to the u. S. Senate and they had to vote there on whether or not to convict him and remove him from office, just like it was with president Andrew Johnson in the previous century, the exact same pattern held. No member of president clintons own party would cast a vote to actually convict him on an