this week, we re taking a deep dive into artificial intelligence, and how it s transforming the world around us. yeah, that includes in healthcare, where we meet the ai helping radiologists to diagnose cancer. you can see these little white dots. the ai is highly suspicious. and in the fast moving game of ai artwork, who owns what? and can artists protect their work? for some time, artificial intelligence has been all around us. you might not have noticed it, but your video streaming services, social media feeds, the maps on your smart phones, they ve all been steadily improving their performance because the computers behind them have been learning. and then last year, something important happened. yeah. ai got human or at least it felt like it did. companies like google and open ai started showing off stunning photorealistic images like these, all created by ai from short text descriptions. and then ai started having conversations with us. they were starting to generate st
are a little blotchier, it looks like there are these kind of yellow patches of pixels in there? exactly. if you had laid these out in front of me and said tell me what is different, iwould be ha rd pressed to tell you. the promise of glaze is exciting for artists, but critics say the ai art generators are taking inspiration the same way a human does by studying other pieces and learning from them. crucially, they say, these aren t copies. that s led the companies being sued to ask for the case against them to be dismissed. karla says, though, that s not a good comparison. i don t see one image, let alone billions of imagery, and instantly like archive it in my mind, and then i m able to generate exact copies, or similar copies in the blink of an eye. some artists have said they would be willing to use their work with al image generators, but they say the process should be opt in, not opt out. stability ai says their new generators will be opt out going forward, and adobe
if you had laid thse out in front of me and said tell me what is different, i would be hard pressed to tell you. the promise of glaze is exciting for artists, but critics say the ai art generators are taking inspiration the same way a human does by studying other pieces and learning from them. crucially, they say, these aren t copies. that s lead the companies being sued to ask for the case against them to be dismissed. karla says though that s not a good comparison. i don t see one image, let alone billions of imagery, and instantly like archive it in my mind, and then i m able to generate exact copies or similar copies in the blink of an eye. some artists said they would be willing to use their work with al image generators, but they say the process should be opt in, not opt out. stability ai says their new generators will be opt out going forward,
you can see some changes already on the texture. the right side one is the original one, this is the glazed one. you can see the face has some added changes here on the painting. right, so the brushstrokes are a little blotchier, it looks like there are these kind of yellow patches of pixels in there? exactly. if you had laid these out in front of me and said tell me what is different, iwould be ha rd pressed to tell you. the promise of glaze is exciting for artists, but critics say the ai art generators are taking inspiration the same way a human does by studying other pieces and learning from them. crucially, they say, these aren t copies. that s led the companies being sued to ask for the case against them to be dismissed. karla says, though, that s not a good comparison. i don t see one image, let alone billions of imagery, and instantly like archive it in my mind, and then i m able
right, so the brushstrokes are a little blotchier, it looks like there are these kind of yellow patches of pixels in there? exactly. if you had laid these out in front of me and said tell me what is different, i would be hard pressed to tell you. the promise of glaze is exciting for artists, but critics say the ai art generators are taking inspiration the same way a human does by studying other pieces and learning from them. crucially, they say, these aren t copies. that s led the companies being sued to ask for the case against them to be dismissed. karla says, though, that s not a good comparison. i don t see one image, - let alone billions of imagery, and instantly like archive it in my mind, and then i m able to generate exact copies, or similar copies in the blink of an eye. some artists have said they would be willing to use their work with al image generators, but they say the process should be