i mean, there were it was quite clear, there was so much intel streaming in that the fbi decided it needed to open a file to contain all the intelligence. they gave it a code name, a hashtag, cert unrest. nobody can say that it wasn t clear, it wasn t happening. and then, you know, i m disappointed in the committee. i have to tell you, they relegated this session to an appendices, they gave no recommendations related to reform in intelligence and they said this was all trump s fault. that may be true, but it s also misleading because it also was the fault of the intelligence and law enforcement communities that failed to act on the available intelligence. now, the report the fbi had that special tab for collecting intelligence related to riot. but, quote, unified monitoring
0 at the justice department s ability to compel their testimony. it is highly sensitive to go after information from a sitting member of congress. but they re not being targeted because their members of congress. they re being targeted because of the conduct, the conversations with donald trump on january 6th. so, i don t see how you investigate this case without talking to them. and maybe their witnesses, maybe their defendants. we ll see how that shakes out. charlie, before we. go just a big picture question. the degree to which generally six committee exceeded expectations and the degree to which there added in terms of the information landscape around january 6th. how much they actually changed? for broader swap the american public. let s hear assessment there. i think they did a good job. they surprise a lot of people who thought they already know this stuff. the video was on tv for all to see. the media reconstruction the events that day. so trump was openly urging those peop
the second thing that you could learn from these transcripts is essentially looking at the questioning here s an example of what i mean garrett s equal who worked for peterton vera in the white house is asked by the investigators isn t it a fact that you told your wife to leave d.c. prior to january six, obviously meaning that you are aware that there would be violence. he takes the fifth but that if you are jacks myth and is an advanced a gator you will dig deep on, how did they know that? can they get the spouse to testify, is it worth immunizing? if you immunize him he is then forced to testify he no longer has a fifth amendment so there are things that can provide some leads, albeit tomorrow i think they will probably learn a whole more when we get the report and footnotes and a lot of the appendices and join
you are jacks myth and is an advanced a gator you will dig deep on, how did they know that? can they get the spouse to testify, is it worth immunizing? if you immunize him he is then forced to testify he no longer has a fifth amendment so there are things that can provide some leads, albeit tomorrow i think they will probably learn a whole more when we get the report and footnotes and a lot of the appendices and join documents. john banks you ve been part
here, having him explain the true tangible impact of american dollars and american support on the ukrainian effort. but then also pushing ahead to why that support needs to be continued coming here for that in-person appeal that could potentially sway some republicans who could be more in line with stopping that funding in the future. yeah. this will be an historic day to watch on capitol hill. regardless of whether some republicans believe that the fight in ukraine, for the safety of the world, is worth it or not. yeah. there are a lot of other things happening today. up there as well, the january 6th committee releasing its full report. what are we going to be looking for with that? and then, of course, there s that spending issue. reporter: yeah, mika, we ve got no shortage of news here to end the year on capitol hill. the january 6th report, we ve known this is coming today. eight chapters to this final report. but the real news is probably going to come in appendices, all