candidate turned president to do something like that. president obama did the same thing. he escalated things anyway. this is par for the course. people run on it and it s hard to pull off. eboni: president obama absolutely ran and many would say won on being the antiwar president. i m assuming he learned a lot more about the situation, it s not as easy to pull out. do you think there s a political consequence and running a particular way? president trump ran as an anti-interventionalists and then having to pivot midcourse? lisa: we haven t seen him say a whole lot about afghanistan. eboni: he talked about america first. lisa: what has he engaged a sin? steve work i m not saying he has. i m saying we are going to find out more tonight. lisa: 59 missiles. ron: he was very much
into american governments apparent though my computers many times it s factual for 20 pushing for sections against china, where she pushing for competition against china, itac meets all the criteria you lay down. what you pointed out is united states seeks to act in the spend is chris. if it s been one of you think it is been interest. they re doing everything russia has done much more. i do but sit at theee united since government. i agree with you. human rights are awful. tucker: so we should wage war. absolutely not. tucker: do you remember when democrats were the antiwar, they sangno songs when, or t-shirts, held concerts, held pea-sized. that was them though. democrats are now the d reflecte party of war. if there is a humanitarian quagmire on the other side of the globe, they are all for committing troops and you better be for it to they will denounce you, don t believe it? ask kelsey gabbert.
now. it was an interesting day, charles murray came to talk about a government he says has grown too big to give kind of a grim picture on the future of america. it was tough for him to do that today. a book from his past, the bell curve, the reason protesters showed up today calling him a racist, interrupting a lecture he was giving to a small group here. where one protester was spitting in the face of a student that came to watch the lecture. and also another one who argued while arguing for his own right to free speech told mr. murray that he would not be able to speak. here s another one. we will show you now. antiwar, charles murray no more. murray, libertarian political scientist created quite a stir back in the 90s when he
charles murray came to talk about a government he says has grown too big to give kind of a grim picture on the future of america. it was tough for him to do that today. a book from his past, the bell curve, the reason protesters showed up today calling him a racist, interrupting a lecture he was giving to a small groupll here. where one protester was spitting in the face of a student that came to watch the lecture. and also another one who argued while arguing for his own right to free speech told mr. murray that he would not be able to speak. here s another one. we will show you now. antiwar, charles murray no more. antiwar, antiwar. murray, libertarian political scientist created quite a stir back in the 90s when he published the bell curve, it tied the iq of americans to howw
barack obama was going to bring us together. we re not together geraldo further apart than we have a rare compliment i to creates matthews in terms of brilliant he made an amazing point about polarization said it began when the democrats started vietnam war then antiwar when nixon was elected, it was the birth of team sport politics because they started the war when republican came in antiwar that is what we are reliving now every single day. that is the biggest point that thees a demonstrators made even though weren t arguing to protect roe v. wade, and women s rights against, the misogyny so forth but the real message was the democratic party is dysfunctional failed to deliver a lackluster campaign, led by by people from a different era, who had no sense of what was happening on the ground, needed a new democratic party, that is the