nothing. we ae over hav thirty one trillion dollars in debt and that massiv$3e tally continues to grow even afters bi this bill . stillll, small government economists, people like steve moore support the bill calling it a step in the rightir direction. republican congressmen, on the other hand , chip roy is referring to it as at sandwich. the washington times, meanwhile, they describe it as a win for the gop, all whiles representing nancy mace, is trashing the deal for normalizing record spendingt wh with the president who can t find his pants. now,ca some republican lawmaker, they are infuriated thatth the compromise maintains what h an unacceptably high level of covid error olef spending and repurpose nearly one hundred billion dollars in spending instead of making poi outright cuts to thent budget. u this is a bill that pushes any further negotiations back until after the presidential election, which is a very keyy point of contentioken. t to many republicans wanted yet an
doing things like that half thcked or for my own personal interest or out of any animus.er there are people that very serious. we worked with very hard on . speaker gingrich was a critic.cl you were a critic of us in january . but the result we achieved. a actually , i wasn t a critic. i didn t mind the process. ear. i just thought you guys shouldao have done it earlier.ul i mean, that should christmaswe and we should have been ready to hit the ground running was just to be clear on the point, sean , is that we we actually achieved something that that almost shockedshocke the country in that process floothe unity that was won so that we could put this bill on the floor and pass it when people said we r e too fractious to do it, they were wrong. and why would you go into a negotiation without calling folks on something that fundamental and blow up the unity? i understand. joshker gingrich, he was just h, i e ask speaker gingric. would be what? i m not trying to interruptu, you to cong