Top american leaders often have problems with israel, which depends heavily on american support. Gunfire. But doesnt necessarily do what the us wants. Usually, though, american officials keep quiet about it. Not so the us deputy secretary of state, kurt campbell. He said publicly the other day israels leaders mostly talk about the idea of a sweeping victory on the battlefield, but the Biden Administration didnt believe such a thing was possible. Neither do many other observers. So why is israel pursuing the idea, and why is Benjamin Netanyahu so willing to ignore what the us wants . I put these questions to shaina oppenheimer, a journalist with bbc monitoring injerusalem. First and foremost, he has some very far right Coalition Partners who have been very hawkish and very clear with him that they want to see the government do certain things, for example, for it to press ahead with a full scale invasion of rafah. And they would also like to see what they would describe as a total Victor
Selfrealization and decent income, but also a comfortable life. The task of the state is radically improve the quality of life of people in rural areas. Each of our villages, towns, villages, no matter how many people live there, is our absolute priority. Development issues, what decisions were made based on the results of the first allrussian forum rural workers. As part of the resolution, a key place will be given to filling the comprehensive program for the development of rural areas with real rubles, full rubles. Achieving sovereignty in the High Technology segment, a center of competence and the development of domestic software. What are the challenges . By the thirtieth year, 80 of Domestic Enterprises must switch to russian software. Instructions, on each of them we are already actively interacting with colleagues, we will develop cooperation in the same businesslike, mutually respectful manner that has developed between the Federation Council and the cabinet of ministers, and o
Least they caught me, it seems to me, by surprise. Yes, vadim, and some were completely shocked, one might say, as eloquent headlines from the leading western media speak about this. For example, an article in the New York Times calls economist Andrei Belousov, appointed head of the military department, has a lot of new weapons by putin. And, of course, by analyzing these changes, western experts are trying to understand how all this will affect the course of the ukrainian conflict. Most people agree that western countries. Is preparing for a socalled war of attrition, in which the one whose Defense Industry is stronger will win. Yes, in this regard, experts agree that the appointment of a good economist to the post of minister of defense is a pretty strong move Vladimir Putin, to which the west has no answer yet. Alexey petrushko monitored the reactions of politicians in washington, brussels, paris and berlin, who in turn monitored the changes in the russian establishment. In this new
The kharkov direction. Putin noted that the capture of such a large city with the current composition of forces is impossible, and our country does not have such a task at this stage, however , current goals may well be adjusted, since ukraine and western countries are consistently raising the ante. As for what is happening in the kharkov direction, this is also their fault, because they they fired and, unfortunately, continue to shell residential areas. Putin emphasized russias readiness for negotiations on ukraine, but only with the participation of our country; the upcoming summit of switzerland, where russia was not invited, but at which they want to present an ultimatum to moscow, the president considers doomed to failure. We look, of course, at what is happening around the meeting announced by everyone in switzerland in geneva, they gather there, we are not going to discuss any formulas that we dont know, but. We have never refused negotiations, unlike the ukrainian side, they wi