we will explain it all in this special edition of the ingraham angle, the twitter files. a few years back, conservative started noticing that their tweets weren t getting the traction they once did. now the common parlance became known as shadow banding. the amplify the reach of certain voices. this was so concerning that former ceo jack dorsey was brought before congress to ask questions about it. are you censoring people? people? no. twitter shadow banding prominent republicans. is that true? no. he was doing in a minute fasting. jack dorsey better be lawyering up. it sure looked like he lied under oath. playing kind of a game of semantics there. a little over two hours ago, former new york times columnist and free-speech champion began dropping more of those internal twitter files that show just how dedicated the company was for suppressing dissenting voices. for years this was going on. the liberals of last century, they used to relish at all these stories o
house republicans as was the indication 100 years ago are denying the man who thought he would be speaker in this case, kevin mccarthy, the necessary votes to win the speakers gavel. meaning that, right now, the house is completely paralyzed. we do not have a speaker, official members of congress or rules. and the math is frankly, only getting worse for kevin mccarthy. as the process drags out, the total number of republicans not voting for him is going up. the total number of republicans voting for him is going down. let s go straight to cnn s congressional correspondent manu raju. we re hearing that each side of this republican against republican standoff might appoint four members to negotiate some way forward? that s what sources tell us. that s what s under discussion right now. to come up with some sort of group, a negotiating grope to break the standoff paralyzing the house and preventing the congress from moving forward. four people close to kevin mccarthy. and othe
issue of jamal khashoggi. i m sure he was really a firm. he also confirmed that yes, he did beg for more oil but details were few and far between. take a look. we had a good discussion on ensuring global energy security and adequate oil supplies to support global economic growth, and that will begin shortly. i m doing all i can to increase the supply for the united states of america, which i expect to happen. the saudis shared that urgency and based on our discussions today i expect we will see further steps in the coming weeks. reporter: your coming under a lot of fire for your fist bump with the crown prince. i will give you a chance to respond but how can you be sure that another murder like jamal khashoggi won t happen again? god love you, what a silly question. how could i possibly be sure of any of that? i just made it clear if anything like that happens again they will get that response and much more. sean: silly question. you know what the sad thing is? we don
never-kevin s. the number is high, but, if we focus on what we have to do for the next two years, you ll see people come around. so, let s assume that happens, and there s a further liberalization of the rules, weakening of the speakership, which some may argue is actually better for democracy anyway, that s certainly the position chip roy has. where it s easier to amendment legislation, it s easier to demand a vote on something. as opposed to the stricter rules which are in place right now. will that be a speakership that prevents further chaos? we re seeing a lot of chaos right now. might this just be a preview of what the house republican majority looks like with these weaker rules for the speaker? listen, news flash, it doesn t matter what the rules will be, and it doesn t matter who the speaker will be, it is
yes. laura: shadow banning sounds it s not so great but is it really that bad? we get caught up in the left wing traps of their semantic massaging. the verbal massaging of what they are doing but whether it s to our kids, in this case to free speech. may be to gun rights, gun safety. it s not anti-second amendment legislation. this is censorship. yes. laura: they targeted you. i assumed the angle was targeted. and prominent doctors, we had bhattacharya, jay bhattacharya l, peter mccullough emma two of the most renowned thinkers on these issues be cardiologist, mccullough epidemiologist, one of the most published cardiologists in the united states but if they can do it to him, they can do it to anyone for they did it to you and lord knows who was really directing this or suggesting it strongly from the biden or trump administration.