A Historic Resource it is most often the caiss we would know, but not always. That is why we sometimes just identify what the potential effects are. There are some cases where if it isnt known whether a building or property is historic we may conduct a review to determine if it is historic. It is possible that review may be ongoing and may not have that conclusion, but generally we will wait to issue the nop before we know that question because it is so important in formialating our alternatives and moving forward in the review process thank you. Commission hiland. Thank you for your presentation, it is very informative. I have a question on the scoping of the alternatives. You said if there is a alternative that isnt feasible and doesnt get furthered, how does that determine if it is made . We see a lot of eirs that the preservation alternative is very slim and it seems to be i would think that if that was exploreed further in the scoping or if there was another option that may have n
Project that we have alternatives that would address that Significant Impact and if one is Historic Resource impact it is a preservation alternative. There is a difference between a preservation alternative or full or partial preservation alturn trfb. A full preservation alternative would avoid or lessen the impact of the Historic Resource so that the impact wouldnt occur and may be the golden standard of preservation for a project. The partial preservation alternative recognizes that sometimes there are site consideration or constraint that make it more challenging to come up with a preservation alternative that is as robust as we might otherwise like to see so partial preservation would be preserving as many of the futures orstructureoffs the buildsing that convey the significance and as possible. Taking into account the project objectives. Then we get into some of thenumber 3, clayifys when you can call something preservation alternative or not. You get into some of the requirements
To come up with a preservation alternative that is as robust as we might otherwise like to see so partial preservation would be preserving as many of the futures orstructureoffs the buildsing that convey the significance and as possible. Taking into account the project objectives. Then we get into some of thenumber 3, clayifys when you can call something preservation alternative or not. You get into some of the requirements for how we present information eirs and the graphic materials and analysis item number 4 and we heard from the commission that you would like to see preservation alturn trfbs that are flushed out to a degree we can really get a sense of what the material differences are from the proposed project and that would support a full consideration of those alternatives for approval thmpt eir in number 5 we will include an analysis and description of how we formialilate the alternative and any alternative we rejected. Number 6 somewhat relates to a partial preservation altern
2015, i would like to remind members of the audience to silence any mobile devices that may sound off during these proceedings. I would like to take roll. Commissioner hasz, hyland, wolfram, johns, commissioner matsuda and commissioner pearlman. We expect commissioner johnck to be absent. Public comment. Public tomorrow we are conducting in the tenderloin, we are focusing on two National Registered districts than the nationally located district for broader outreach to communities where neighborhoods are eligible. Meeting will be held tomorrow from 6 30 p. M. To 8 30 p. M. Many it will be a workshop format where Property Owners can come to ask question and we focused a pretty large notification to Property Owners. Depending on the workshop, we will keep you up to date. Item 2. Requesting of staff to report back on a matter. I have nothing to report. However i want to mention to you that the Planning Commission is very interested in the resolution on your agenda today and we will be shar
Confidence. I really enjoy my tenure. Thank you. Commissioners, item 6. Questions . I unfortunately wasnt able to be at the last commission meeting. But i did want to recognize that at the history expo at the old mint, the last of february and first of march, the Planning Department Historic Preservation commission had a booth. I noticed there was a map there where people can pinpoint things they were interested in. I saw there was a respectable crowd outside of the booth talking to the people who were manning it and i thought it was extremely nice. Thank you. Commissioner hyland . I had two things. One for those who may or may not know this, i had the opportunity to go to washington d. C. , thats where i was last hearing and we were doing legislative day for the American Institute of architects and we had the opportunity to meet Nancy Pelosis aids. Mostly what i wanted to bring up today is advocate for three legislations and one of them was the continuance of the Historic Preservation